Learn the Art of Indexology to Writing Lagrangians with Tensors

taishizhiqiu
Messages
61
Reaction score
4
I recently read that indexology is the art of writing a Lagrangian by just knowing how many dimensions it has and how to contract tensors. I am very interested in this technique, but I cannot find any reference. Can anyone give me a guidance or a reference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Um... You read this where? You might get a scalar from this. But a Lagrangian has to satisfy a few more conditions than just being a scalar.
 
taishizhiqiu said:

Actually, the first one does help. It talks about the other conditions a Lagrangian must satisfy for an electromagnetic field. That is, you need more than just the dimension and how to contract tensors.
 
DEvens said:
Actually, the first one does help. It talks about the other conditions a Lagrangian must satisfy for an electromagnetic field. That is, you need more than just the dimension and how to contract tensors.
Oh, I think I didn't express myself clearly.

The first book is where I first read about indexology and that's why I asked such a question.

I basically understand the technique. What I want to know is more details. For example, I don't know why only ##\delta_{\alpha\beta}## and ##\epsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda}## is the only two isotropic tensors and I don't even know what are isotropic tensors. That's why I am here asking for reference.
 
taishizhiqiu said:
I basically understand the technique. What I want to know is more details. For example, I don't know why only ##\delta_{\alpha\beta}## and ##\epsilon_{\mu\nu\lambda}## is the only two isotropic tensors and I don't even know what are isotropic tensors. That's why I am here asking for reference.

Google is your friend.

http://mathworld.wolfram.com/IsotropicTensor.html
http://www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/reh10/lectures/nst-mmii-chapter3.pdf
http://www2.ph.ed.ac.uk/~rhorsley/SI12-13_socm/lec08.pdf
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/isotropic-tensors.106292/
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top