Learn the Derivation of Motion Equations with Expert Guidance

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation
AI Thread Summary
The motion equations s=ut+0.5at^2 and v^2=u^2+2as are derived from the definition of acceleration as the second derivative of position with respect to time. When acceleration is constant, integrating the acceleration equation leads to the velocity equation, v=at+v_0, where v_0 is the initial velocity. Further integration of the velocity equation provides the position function, x(t)=0.5at^2+v_0t. The second equation can be derived through algebraic manipulation and substitution of the acceleration definition into the position equation. Understanding these derivations is essential for grasping the fundamentals of motion in physics.
Omar
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm new to the forums. This is my first thread here. I just wanted help in knowing where the motion equations (s=ut+0.5at^2, and v^2=u^2+2as) are derived from?

Thanks in advance..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
They are a consequence of the definition of acceleration as the second derivative of position (as a function of time). When the acceleration is constant, it's easy to find the velocity by doing a very simple integration.

x''(t)=a

x'(t)=at+v_0

The constant term is the velocity at time t=0. If we integrate this, we find the position as a function of time.

x(t)=\frac{1}{2}at^2+v_0t

I could have added a new constant term that would have represented the position at time t=0, but this is usually chosen to be zero.

The second equation in your post can be derived from the velocity and position equations above.
 
fundamentally they were derived from equation of acceleration.

:)
 
start off with the definition of acceleration...
a = \frac{v_f-v_0}{t}
v_f = v_0 + at

Definition of average velocity...
v_{ave} = d/t
d = \frac{v_f + v_0}{2}t

substitute...

d = \frac{(v_0+at) + v_0}{2}t
d = \frac{2v_0 + at}{2}t
d = v_0t + \frac{1}{2}at^2

For the second equation...it just a lot of manipulation of the equation above and a substitution of the definition of accleration.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top