Courses Learning Parallel Computation as a particle physicist

AI Thread Summary
Investing in a course in Parallel Computation is highly recommended for those pursuing a Master's Degree in Nuclear and Particle Physics. While some may argue that only computational physicists need this knowledge, the reality is that most physicists utilize computers extensively in their work. Parallel computation is a crucial skill that enhances problem-solving capabilities in various physics applications. However, the decision to take the course should consider individual coding proficiency; for those less inclined towards coding, it may not be beneficial. Conversely, for those with coding skills, focusing on programming GPUs or FPGAs could be more advantageous. Ultimately, the choice depends on one's specific career path and the opportunity costs associated with the time invested in learning parallel computation.
orochi
Messages
3
Reaction score
1
I am starting my Master's Degree in Nuclear and Particle Physics, should i invest in taking a course in Parallel Computation? I know the role that Parallel Computation has in particle physics, but is there any use in a particle physicst learning about parallel computation, or could it be considered a waste of time since only physicists specialized in computational physics need to know about parallel computation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say yes, you should take the course. Virtually all practicing physicists use computers extensively, not just "physicists specialized in computational physics". Parallel computation is a very important tool to have in your toolbox.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and orochi
I don’t think it is that clear cut. If you are not a coder type, it is probably not a good idea. If you are a coder type, it might be better to learn to program gpu’s or fpga’s. Or parallel programming might be exactly what you need. It depends on your specific path. Everything has an opportunity cost.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Back
Top