Studying Leisure Math Textbook: Moving from AP Calc BC to Multivariable/Vector Calc

  • Thread starter Thread starter theJorge551
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Textbook
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a student's quest for advanced math textbooks to supplement their learning beyond the standard curriculum of IB Math HL and AP Calculus BC. The student expresses a desire to explore multivariable and vector calculus, as well as pure mathematics topics such as topology and analytic geometry. Recommendations include using Schaum's outlines alongside chosen textbooks and leveraging resources like Khan Academy for additional support. One suggested textbook is "Calculus" by Michael Spivak, noted for its rigorous approach to proofs and problem-solving. The student is also interested in finding more advanced calculus-based physics texts to deepen their understanding. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the importance of independent study and the pursuit of challenging material in mathematics.
theJorge551
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hello all, just a question I've been tossing about lately. I've been recently given the chance to get any math textbook I'd like (outside of school), because I'm a tad bored with my current math classes. Right now, I'm taking the first year of IB Math HL (the junior course), and it is pathetically simple...so I'm simultaneously taking it with AP Calculus BC. The latter is certainly more involved and I enjoy it much more, but I really enjoy advancing my knowledge independently as well (I was doing differentiation and integration on my own last year, while I was in an Algebra II / Trigonometry class.) So, does anyone have a suggestion for what textbook I should purchase for independent progression? As in, which course/area is a student likely to move on to after the topics covered in AP Calculus BC? I'd like to move forward into multivariable/vector calculus (I can take statistics when I get into college.)

Any comments much appreciated!

- Jorge
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It is hard to recommend anything without knowing your proficiency level in calculus. However, whatever textbook you might end up choosing, in my opinion, should be supplemented with its Schaum's outline equivalent. Also, you might want to use Khan Academy videos concurrently to your independent study. Best of luck to you.
 
I've done nearly all types of differentiation (product, quotient, & chain rule; implicit differentiation, trigonometric differentiation, logarithmic differentiation, etc.), as well as some basic integration (integration by parts; u-substitution; areas under curves; volumes of revolution), limits, and not a great deal more than that. My Calculus BC course this year will cover much more (e.g., infinite series, more complex integration, l'Hopital's rule, improper integration), but I tend to jump the gun with new topics...hence, I'll likely have done the next few weeks of curriculum by the time I learn something, but I'm also fine with physics texts that employ the use of calculus. The calculus-based physics book I'm reading from now is pretty basic, and I'm interested in something more advanced. And, thanks for your advice! I will definitely check out those resources.
 
Stewart's is good.
 
This is partially a mere thread bump, but I've also considered a new question to pose (this seems to be the thread to post it in.)

I've been very interested in pure mathematics lately, and would like to study various fields of mathematics alongside AP Calculus that don't necessarily require it. Perhaps introductory topology? Analytic geometry? What do all of you, educated in these areas, think I would likely be best suited to get a head-start on, and with what texts? I think it would be very helpful for me to have some practice with formal proofs and more pure math (an example would be the epsilon-delta conjecture to prove limits, rather than just taking it from an intuitive sense.) Comments?

I've got my hands on an older Stewart book from my calculus teacher, and it's quite involved. I'm enjoying it, but would like to extend myself a bit more in other fields simultaneously.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
6K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top