Length contraction and general relativity

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
Can one detect length contraction due to general relativity? I.e does length/width/height change with distance to a gravitational centre? If so does the object get longer or shorter?

I know this is the case with increasing speed in special relativity, but what about GR...

If i went into space, would my physical body be subject to any kind of of change in size?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing to get about either special or general relativity is that there is no such thing as the absolute size of objects, there isn't even absolute comparisons between the sizes of two things that are in relative motion (in special relativity), or in relative motion in two different places in a gravitational field (in general relativity). Thus one should not talk about things "getting longer or shorter" in some kind of definite, widely-agreed-on, "invariant" way. You see language like that a lot, but it's quite confused. Instead, relativity is about recognizing that if you compare the length of two objects, the answer you get depends on how you do the comparison, which is often called your "reference frame". Loosely, this means how you are moving relative to the objects (in special relativity), or where you are in a gravitational field relative to the objects (in general relativity).

Often, the two objects you will care about are a ruler that is in your hand, and some other ruler that is somewhere else or moving some other way. Then if you adopt standard conventions about how to make length comparisions (which means, more technically, choosing a standard way to coordinatize the spacetime, which in general means making a choice of a grid of observers whose rulers and clocks you will use to talk about the places and times where events occur), you will find that both in special relativity and in general relativity, you will reckon the other ruler to be shorter (if it is moving relative to you or at a higher gravitational potential), or longer (if it is lower in a gravitational potential than you are), relative to the ruler in your hand.

So I think your answer is, in general you must combine the effects of motion and the effects of gravity, and you must choose coordinates, to decide how a length comparison will turn out. The answer you get depends on your choice of coordinates unless you restrict to questions that deal strictly in the "invariants" (and length is not one of those, that was one of the big surprises of relativity).
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top