Length Contraction & Angled Motion

asdf1
Messages
734
Reaction score
0
if length contraction only applies in the direction of motion, then what happens if there is an angle to the direction of motion that's not perpendicular?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
asdf1 said:
if length contraction only applies in the direction of motion, then what happens if there is an angle to the direction of motion that's not perpendicular?
I assume you are asking "What happens to the length in a direction that is neither parallel nor perpendicular to the direction of motion?" If that is what you mean, then the answer is:

Resolve the length into two components, one of which is parallel to the direction of motion and the other of which is perpendicular to it. The length of the component that is parallel to the direction of motion will contract, but the length of the component that is perpendicular will not. Recombine the new components and take the length of the resultant. Compare the length of the resultant to the original length. That is the contraction.
 
thank you very much! :)
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...

Similar threads

Back
Top