Length Contraction Relativity Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a length contraction question in relativity, where an airplane's length is measured in its rest frame and compared to its length as observed from the ground while flying at 900 km/h. The user attempts to apply the length contraction formula but concludes that there is no contraction since the speed is not close enough to the speed of light (c). However, other participants clarify that while the contraction effect is minimal at such speeds, it can still be calculated. They suggest using the Taylor expansion for a more accurate approximation when the speed is significantly less than c. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the mathematical principles behind length contraction in relativity.
goldilocks
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am not sure if I am doing this right or not. It seems to simple to be the right aswer, I feel I must have gone wrong somewhere. Many thanks :-) xxx

Homework Statement



Length Contraction Relativity Question?

An aeroplane is of length L’(m) precisely when measured in its rest frame at the airport. In what percentage it will contract if measured by the same ground-based observer if it was flying past at 900 km.p.h?
[Here you may need Taylor’s expansion]


Homework Equations



Lmoving= Lrest x SQR[1 - (V/C)^2]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to start this. I used Lmoving= Lrest x SQR[1 - (V/C)^2]

Lrest = L'(m)

Lmoving = L'(m)
= L'(m) x SQR(1-(250^2/(3x10^8)^2)
= L'(m) x SQR (1- 6.9445x10^-13)
= L'(m) x SQR (1)
= L'(m)

So there is no contraction as v is not near enough to c for realtivity to take effect. Is this right? I didn't use taylor expansion, so have I gone wrong somewhere. Thanks a lot. xxx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
goldilocks said:
So there is no contraction as v is not near enough to c for realtivity to take effect. Is this right?
No. Since the speed is small compared to c, the effect will be small. But you can still calculate it.

I didn't use taylor expansion, so have I gone wrong somewhere.
Hint: Look up the Taylor expansion of \sqrt{1 + x}, where x << 1.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top