Length Contraction: Solving for L

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving for the length of a moving rod using the concept of length contraction in special relativity. The proper length L_0 is defined in the S' frame, while the observer in the S frame measures the contracted length L. Key equations include L = L_o / gamma and the relationship involving the angle θ_0, where the horizontal component of the length contracts. Participants clarify that the contraction only affects the component of the rod's length parallel to the direction of motion, leading to the conclusion that L = L_o [1 - (v^2 / c^2) cos^2 (θ_o)]^(1/2). The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the geometry of the situation to accurately apply these concepts.
Herricane
Messages
61
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A rod of length L_0 moves with a speed v along the horizontal direction. The rod makes an angle of θ_0 with respect to the x'-axis.

a. Show that the length of the rod as measured by a stationary observer is given by L = L_o [1 - (v^2 / c^2) cos^2 (θ_o) ]^(.5)


Homework Equations



L = L_p/ gamma

The Attempt at a Solution



I have a few questions:

Is L proper L_o (the S frame?)
When I am trying to find the length of the rod as measured by a stationary observer do I refer to the graph to the right?

Horizontal length is all I need to worry about, correct?

L = L_o / gamma

x' = L cos θ_o

x' = x ( 1 - v^2/c^2 )^(-1/2)

L cos θ_o = x ( 1 - v^2/c^2 )^(-1/2)

L = x / [ (1 - v^2/c^2 )^(1/2) cos θ_o ] where x = L_o

L = L_o / [ (1 - v^2/c^2 )^(1/2) cos θ_o ]

Am I on the right track? I can't seem to make it look like:
L = L_o [1 - (v^2 / c^2) cos^2 (θ_o) ]^(.5)
 

Attachments

  • Picture 1.png
    Picture 1.png
    2.2 KB · Views: 514
Physics news on Phys.org
Wait, huh, is the picture you attached one given by the problem or something you made? The picture is really different from how I read the problem.

The way you're approaching the problem seems fine. But if you're going to find the x coordinates, you need to find two x coordinates because length is x2-x1. Looks like you're doing a strange mixing of length contraction and x coordinates. Either approach is okay, but you'll probably confuse yourself going between them (confused me at least).
 
Yes I think that is my problem. I don't know how to draw the diagram. Can you explain me what you understood? I have read it several times and I just don't get it
 
So you have an S' that moving relative to the S frame; their x-axis is collinear. In S' we have a proper length L_o, and the length makes an angle with respect to the x' axis. So the part that will be contracted is L_o*cosØ'. L_o*sinØ' will stay the same in both frames. S even sees a different angle than S' does.
 
Thank you, I figured out the problem. I was making it way too complicated.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top