Length of a missing side no angle given :(

  • Thread starter Thread starter t3rom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Length
AI Thread Summary
Finding the fourth side of an irregular plot with only three known sides is not possible without additional information, such as angles or area. The discussion emphasizes that the fourth side could vary widely, depending on the configuration of the existing sides. Suggestions include using the cosine rule if more data were available, but without it, no definitive formula can be established. The consensus is that additional details are essential to determine the missing side accurately. Therefore, the problem remains unsolvable with the given information.
t3rom
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
I'm given an irregular shaped plot with 3 sides, and have been asked to find the fourth missing side, no other detail is given. Is it possible to find the missing side? If so, then how? Here is what it looks like roughly:

8wids2.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I don't think that it's possible. What if it looks like this?
polygon.jpg
 
Looks like you need one more piece of data ... angles, area - etc... however you could write a formula for ? based on the missing info.
 
Borg said:
I don't think that it's possible. What if it looks like this?
View attachment 79370

That can be a possibility as it's a plot with irregular sides.

Windadct said:
Looks like you need one more piece of data ... angles, area - etc... however you could write a formula for ? based on the missing info.

Can I write a formula without the missing data? If so then how, please elaborate..
 
t3rom said:
That can be a possibility as it's a plot with irregular sides.
Can I write a formula without the missing data? If so then how, please elaborate..

Draw a diagonal and apply the cosine rule.
 
t3rom said:
I'm given an irregular shaped plot with 3 sides, and have been asked to find the fourth missing side, no other detail is given. Is it possible to find the missing side? If so, then how? Here is what it looks like roughly:

8wids2.jpg
It's not possible to find the fourth side, assuming that all we know is the lengths of the three sides. The fourth side could be anywhere from 0 to (a triangle) to 29.9 + 19.5 + 30.05 (in which you get a straight line.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-sln2)+e^(-sln3)+e^(-sln4)+... , Re(s)>1 If we regards it as some function got from Laplace transformation, and let this real function be ζ(x), that means L[ζ(x)]=ζ(s), then: ζ(x)=L^-1[ζ(s)]=δ(x)+δ(x-ln2)+δ(x-ln3)+δ(x-ln4)+... , this represents a series of Dirac delta functions at the points of x=0, ln2, ln3, ln4, ... , It may be still difficult to understand what ζ(x) means, but once it is integrated, the truth is clear...
Back
Top