Leonard-Jones potential: Further reading

  • Thread starter Thread starter letshin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Potential Reading
letshin
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Dear All,

Recently I've started looking at the Leonard-Jones potential for a project; and I'm trying to look for a book that covers the potential in additional detail beyond the standard +ve and -ve contributions.

Can anyone please recommend some books for further reading?

Most of the books I've come across treat the potential as a sort of run-by thing. They mention it and then just forget about it later on...

Cheers,
Z
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ooooh thanks. I had a look at that and it looks rather useful at understanding the subject matter. However it seem to not elucidate on the potential in solids.

I'm wondering if the Lenard Jones potential/interatomic potentials can describe the mechanical properties of a solid and been trying to find some books on that. :/
 
Lennard Jones potential can describe closed shell solids reasonably well, that is the crystals of the noble gases (He, Ar, ...). But it is definitely a bad representation of metals and of course not adequate for covalent elements (Si, Ge,...).

L-J as a pair potential (2-body in contrast to many body potentials such as EAM and the like) fails in:
1) It gives C11=C44 (elastic constants) which is not observed in most metals
2) It gives "outward" surface relaxation which is not the case for many materials (it is indeed inward).More on these aspects can be found in any text on atomistic simulation such as

https://www.amazon.com/dp/0122673514/?tag=pfamazon01-20

Another good resource is MIT video lectures . All what I mentioned and more is discussed in lecture 2 and 3

http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/material...aterials-sma-5107-spring-2005/video-lectures/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you :)
 
Oh apologies for reviving an old thread, but I thought if anyone was interested in the matter they could read this under the sub-section of interatomic potentials

http://www.uic.edu/labs/trl/1.OnlineMaterials/nano.publications/03.Nanostructures.InterMoleForce.pdf

and proceed from there onwards
 
Last edited by a moderator:
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top