Leptons & Quark Speed in Nucleon | Average at Room Temp

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lok
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed
Lok
Messages
601
Reaction score
24
What would the speed of a quark in a nucleon be? I know they are bound by the strong force to a triangular shape, but to an outside observer they must show some movement, or the triangular structure as a whole should. What is it's speed ( average for room temperature )?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Lok said:
What would the speed of a quark in a nucleon be? I know they are bound by the strong force to a triangular shape, but to an outside observer they must show some movement, or the triangular structure as a whole should. What is it's speed ( average for room temperature )?

You can find the "speed" by doing the same calculation as you would have done in finding the speed for an electron in an atom. Start from the Heisenberg uncertantiy realation for instance, take the size of the nucleon, 1fm, and then you'll get the order of magnitude of momentum. Then mass of quark is approx 5MeV/c². There are other ways in doing this of course, which can give you an approximate value of the speed.
 
Lok said:
What would the speed of a quark in a nucleon be? I know they are bound by the strong force to a triangular shape, but to an outside observer they must show some movement, or the triangular structure as a whole should. What is it's speed ( average for room temperature )?

Just out of curiosity, what does this have anything to do with "the speed of leptons"?

Zz.
 
It was about quarks ... but i was a little confused for a bit... then i edited the post but the title remained.

Tx for the formula. Is there any geometrical view on their motion though. There must be a reason for the inabillity to create 4(and beyond) quark particles, and the condition seems geometrical in nature.
 
Lok said:
It was about quarks ... but i was a little confused for a bit... then i edited the post but the title remained.

Tx for the formula. Is there any geometrical view on their motion though. There must be a reason for the inabillity to create 4(and beyond) quark particles, and the condition seems geometrical in nature.

It has to do with the colour charges of the quarks, and colour confinement.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top