Levitating Metal with a Solar Cooker: A Feasibility Study

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion explores the feasibility of using a solar cooker to levitate aluminum foil by focusing sunlight. Key parameters include an aluminum density of 2.7 g/cm³, sunlight intensity of 1000 W/m², and a foil thickness of 2.5 micrometers. Calculations indicate that the gravitational force on the aluminum is approximately 6.6 microNewtons, while the focused sunlight could generate about 12 microNewtons, resulting in a net upward force of 6 microNewtons. Concerns regarding the melting of aluminum and the need for a vacuum environment to prevent combustion in atmospheric oxygen are also addressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly force and gravity
  • Knowledge of solar energy concepts and solar cooker design
  • Familiarity with optics, specifically lens and mirror functionality
  • Awareness of material properties, particularly thermal behavior of aluminum
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced optics for solar energy concentration techniques
  • Explore vacuum chamber designs for experimental setups
  • Investigate thermal properties of aluminum at various temperatures
  • Learn about the principles of levitation and stability in focused light applications
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, hobbyists, and engineers interested in solar energy applications, optical physics, and experimental levitation techniques.

dansmith170
Messages
45
Reaction score
11
TL;DR
I would like to build a solar cooker that can levitate a thin piece of metal using sunlight, will it work?
I would like to build what is usually used for heat production and is called a solar cooker. However, I would like to use it to try to levitate a piece of metal.

Here are my assumptions:

A. aluminum density = 2.7 g / cm^3
B. Sunlight intensity on Earth's surface is about 1000 W / m^2
C. aluminum thickness = 2.5 micrometers (https://geistnote.com/2-5-m-aluminum-foil/)
D. Aluminum area = 1 centimeter squared
E. solar cooker area = about 2 square meters
F. acceleration due to gravity on Earth = about 9.9 meters / second^2
G. I take it that some kind of lens maybe be necessary to focus the light reflected off the solar cooker to a smaller area of about 1 square centimeter.

If my math is correct, I think the force of gravity on aluminum with the aforementioned specifications equals about 6.6 microNewtons. The force of sunlight focused from the solar cooker to an area of 1 square centimeter equals about 12 microNewtons. So, the resultant net force on the piece of aluminum foil should be about 6 microNewtons and should be directed skywards. This should cause the aluminum foil to levitate or move in the skyward direction, counter to the direction that gravity would otherwise cause it to move.

Does this sound like it could work? I guess one concern I have is whether this much focused light would melt the aluminum foil.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dansmith170 said:
Does this sound like it could work? I guess one concern I have is whether this much focused light would melt the aluminum foil.
You must carry out the experiment in a vacuum, or the aluminium would instantly burn in the oxygen of the atmosphere, then rise as a thermal plume.

If you use a lens, the lens will get hot because it is not perfectly transparent at all wavelengths. Use mirrors that radiate heat from their back surface.

dansmith170 said:
G. I take it that some kind of lens maybe be necessary to focus the light reflected off the solar cooker to a smaller area of about 1 square centimeter.
The Sun has a diameter of just over 0.5 degrees when viewed from the Earth. You will need some fancy optics to concentrate that area of energy to a point, then collimate it to be a parallel beam, pushing in one direction.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, BillTre and berkeman
The foil will do every possible trick to move to sides and rotate - leaving the beam.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters and Tom.G

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K