Liberty League International Complex Numbers

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the complex plane and the real plane, exploring both graphical and algebraic connections. Participants inquire about the nature of these planes, the operations defined on them, and the implications of these operations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the complex plane and the real plane are fundamentally the same in terms of representation, with complex numbers corresponding to points in Cartesian coordinates.
  • Others clarify that while addition of complex numbers mirrors vector addition in the real plane, multiplication is uniquely defined in the complex plane.
  • A participant questions the absence of defined inequalities in the complex plane, prompting a discussion on the nature of ordered fields and the contradictions that arise when attempting to impose an order on complex numbers.
  • One participant provides a detailed explanation of why complex numbers cannot be made into an ordered field, citing the trichotomy principle and resulting contradictions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding regarding the relationship between the complex and real planes, with some agreeing on the graphical representation while others delve into the complexities of operations and ordering, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved on certain points.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes limitations regarding the definitions of operations in different mathematical contexts and the implications of attempting to define inequalities in the complex plane, which remain unresolved.

Liberty Leagu
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I may be asking a stupid question, but what is the co-relation between the complex plane and the real plane? I know Euler's equation ei\pi+1=0 relates them, but graphically, how are they related?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Liberty Leagu said:
I may be asking a stupid question, but what is the co-relation between the complex plane and the real plane? I know Euler's equation ei\pi+1=0 relates them, but graphically, how are they related?

Hi Liberty Leagu ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

They're the same!

Except, of course, that you can't multiply points in the real plane. :rolleyes:

But addition of comlex numbers is exactly the same as addition of real-plane vectors.

x + iy corresponds to the Cartesian coordinates (x,y) in every way.

And r.e corresponds to the polar coordinates (r,θ) in every way. :smile:
 
As Tiny-tim said, the real plane R2, consists of "points" and there is no arithmetic defined on it- you cannot add or multiply points. You can also think of R2 as the (Euclidean) vector space in which you have addition and scalar multiplication defined but not multiplication of two vectors to give a third vector. In the complex plane C, we have both addition and multiplication of "points" defined and so think of them as numbers.
 
chaoseverlasting said:

Hi chaoseverlasting! :smile:

Are you and Liberty Leagu the same person … I notice that your original posts were exactly the same?

Have we answered as you wanted? :confused:

Your last post (above) is a bit cryptic! :wink:
 
No. We're not the same person. Which is why I was wondering about this. How are the real plane and complex plane related? Is there any relation?
 
BTW, why can we not define inequalities in the complex plane?
 
You can, it is always possible to assign a linear order to a set, but not in any useful way. The complex numbers cannot be made into an ordered field. An ordered field is a field, together with an order such that if a< b then a+ c< b+ c for any c and, if a< b and 0< c, then ac< bc.

Suppose we were to define an order on the complex numbers. Then, by "trichotomy" we must have exactly one of 0< i or i< 0 or 0= i. Certainly 0 is not equal to i because 02= 0 and i2= -1.

Suppose 0< i. Then 0*i< i*i so 0< -1. That, in itself is not a contradiction, since this is not necessarily our usual order, but from that we must have 0*i< -1*i or 0< -i. If we add i to both sides of that i< 0 which contradicts 0< i.

Suppose i< 0. Then, adding -i to both sides, 0< -i. Now, multiplying both sides of i< 0 by -i, we have -(-1)< 0 or 1< 0. Again, that itself is not a contradiction but multiplying boyh sides by -i gives -i< 0 which contradicts 0< -i.

Since we get a contradiction in every case, such an order is not possible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K