MHB Lie Algebras and Similarity Transformations

topsquark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
MHB
Messages
2,020
Reaction score
843
Say we have an adjoint representation (specifically in n x n matrix format) of a Lie algebra. I have noted that we can create another n x n representation using a similarity transformation on the adjoint rep. I know I haven't discovered anything new but none of my sources mention this. Is there any advantage to using a similarity transformation rep over the adjoint rep?

-Dan

PS: I should perhaps also mention that the adjoint rep is a Cartan-Weyl basis and the similarity transformation rep is as well.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If I'm reading this correctly, what you've done is made an equivalent representation by changing basis from the Cartan-Weyl basis. What was the goal exactly? What kind of result are you looking for?
 
Last edited:
Euge said:
If I'm reading this correctly, what you've done is made an equivalent representation by changing basis from the Cartan-Weyl basis. What was the goal exactly? What kind of result are you looking for?
A little while ago I was having some difficulty with basis changes for the generators of a Lie algebra. I finally figured out what I was doing wrong and in the process of fixing my flawed proofs and ideas I was working with the adjoint representation and discovered the similarity transformation property. For some reason I hadn't expected to find more than one n x n (nontrivial basis change) representation of the Lie algebra. So I was just checking to see if the similarity idea had any particular use.

Oddly enough I did find examples of this today in a Physics text and realized that one of my Lie algebra texts did actually make a brief mention of this for su(2), though in this particular example the structure factors do change under the similarity transformation. (The similarity transformation didn't use the adjoint rep for su(2) but was enough to satisfy my curiosity.)

-Dan
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top