Lie derivative of two left invariant vector fields

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Lie derivative of two left-invariant vector fields within the context of Lie groups, as presented in Nakahara's book. Participants explore the implications of the Lie derivative and the nature of left-invariant vector fields, questioning why the Lie bracket of such fields does not vanish identically despite their defining a one-parameter flow.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes the definition of the Lie derivative of a vector field along the flow of another vector field and questions why the Lie bracket of two left-invariant vector fields does not vanish, given that they define a one-parameter flow.
  • Another participant clarifies that the notation $\sigma_{\epsilon}(x)$ does not represent a left action, but rather a diffeomorphism from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms, emphasizing the distinction between flow and left action.
  • A later reply reiterates the clarification about $\sigma_{\epsilon}$, explaining that it sends each point of the manifold to the point reached after a time $\epsilon$ under the flow, rather than under a left action.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views regarding the interpretation of the notation and the implications for the Lie bracket of left-invariant vector fields. The discussion remains unresolved as there is no consensus on the implications of these definitions.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the need for clarity regarding the definitions and roles of the diffeomorphism group and left actions, which may affect the understanding of the Lie derivative and the behavior of left-invariant vector fields.

konik13
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,
I was following Nakahara's book and I really got my mind stuck with something. I would appreciate if anybody could help with this.

The Lie derivative of a vector field Y along the flow \sigma_t of another vector field X is defined as
L_X Y=lim_{\epsilon\to0}\frac{1}{\epsilon}\left[Y|_{x}-(\sigma_{\epsilon})_* Y|_{\sigma_{-\epsilon}(x)}\right]
wich is equal to the Lie bracket [X,Y].
Now when he goes on and defines the left invariant vector field X of a Lie group, this is given by demanding the relation
L_{a*}X|_g=X|_{a\,g}
where L_a is the left translation by a.

I guess we can assume that this left translation is the result of a flow of some other field.

My question is that since every left-invariant vector field defines a one parameter flow, why the Lie bracket of two left invariant vector fields doesn't vanish identically?

However, we know that the left invariant vector fields define the Lie algebra of the group and this has non-trivial commutation relations.

Thank you very much for your help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that $\sigma_{\epsilon} (x)$ does not denote a left action. Instead, $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ denotes the diffeomorphism $\sigma_{t} $ with fixed $t=\epsilon$ from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms $\sigma_{t}$ (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group $\sigma_{t}$ is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ you send each point $x$ of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after $\epsilon$ time elapses, if you start the flow from the point $x$.
 
Last edited:
idempotent1729 said:
This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that $\sigma_{\epsilon} (x)$ does not denote a left action. Instead, $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ denotes the diffeomorphism $\sigma_{t} $ with fixed $t=\epsilon$ from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms $\sigma_{t}$ (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group $\sigma_{t}$ is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under $\sigma_{\epsilon}$ you send each point $x$ of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after $\epsilon$ time elapses, if you start the flow from the point $x$.

If I may, 1729 , let me latex-format your answer to make it easier to read (we use double pounds before - and after - to Latex-tag.:

This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that ##\sigma_{\epsilon} (x) ## does not denote a left action. Instead, ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## denotes the diffeomorphism ## \sigma_{t} ## with fixed ##t=\epsilon ## from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms ##\sigma_{t} ## (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group ##\sigma_{t} ## is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## you send each point ##x ## of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after ##\epsilon ## time elapses, if you start the flow from the point ##x ##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: idempotent1729
WWGD said:
If I may, 1729 , let me latex-format your answer to make it easier to read (we use double pounds before - and after - to Latex-tag.:

This is an old question, but since I stumbled upon it when the same confusion briefly bedeviled me after reading Nakahara, I decided to reply in case others follow a similar path. The key is that ##\sigma_{\epsilon} (x) ## does not denote a left action. Instead, ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## denotes the diffeomorphism ## \sigma_{t} ## with fixed ##t=\epsilon ## from the 1-parameter group of diffeomorphisms ##\sigma_{t} ## (see Nakahara section 5.3.1). The diffeomorphism group ##\sigma_{t} ## is the flow resulting from a vector field, but under ##\sigma_{\epsilon} ## you send each point ##x ## of the manifold (the manifold being a Lie group in the case discussed here) not to its image under a left action, but rather to the point the flow has reached after ##\epsilon ## time elapses, if you start the flow from the point ##x ##
Thank you so much! I couldn't for the life of me figure it out!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K