What is the lift force on a car's roof at 100km/hr with an area of 3.9m^2?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the lift force on a car's roof with an area of 3.9m^2 while driving at 100 km/hr, using a density of air at 1.17 kg/m^3. It emphasizes that speed alone does not create lift on a flat surface parallel to the airflow, as there needs to be an object to deflect the air, such as a windshield. The Bernoulli principle is deemed inapplicable in this scenario because the airflow around a flat plate does not transition from high to low pressure. Instead, the ambient pressure remains constant regardless of the car's speed, as indicated by static pressure measurements. Overall, understanding the car's shape is crucial for determining any lift generated at speed.
salpal243
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
the question I am stumped on is "What is the lift force on the roof of your car that has an aera of 3.9m^2 if you are driving 100km/hr? use 1.17kg/m^3 for density of air
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There would have to be something deflecting air away from a flat roof in order to produce lift. Speed alone isn't going to create lift on a flat plate parallel to the relative wind. Bernoulli principle doesn't apply here. You could place a flush mounted static port in a flat roof to measure pressure of the moving air outside and it would indicate the same ambient pressure if the car was stopped or moving (as long as speeds are reasonably sub-sonic).

For a real car, the windshield deflects the air away from the roof, and the overall shape of most cars is similar to a common wing and tends to produce some lift. You'd have to know the profile shape of the car, similar to knowing the profile of an airfoil, in order to determine the lift versus speed.
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
Speed alone isn't going to create lift on a flat plate parallel to the relative wind. Bernoulli principle doesn't apply here. You could place a flush mounted static port in a flat roof to measure pressure of the moving air outside and it would indicate the same ambient pressure if the car was stopped or moving (as long as speeds are reasonably sub-sonic).

Why does Bernoulli principle not apply? My first thought was that it would indeed create a significant difference in pressure...
 
rcgldr said:
Speed alone isn't going to create lift on a flat plate parallel to the relative wind.

Lsos said:
Why does Bernoulli principle not apply?
Because the speed of the air wasn't the result of a transition from higher pressure to lower pressure. In this case, the assumption is that the pressure of the air is ambient. It doesn't matter what the speed of the flat plate is if the flat plate isn't interacting with the air (assume the flat plate doesn't change the speed of the air, ignoring any skin friction effects). This why static ports that are just small openings in the side of an aircraft's fuselage (at a point where the air's speed isn't being changed) can sense the ambient pressure of the air, regardless of the speed of the aircraft (as long as speed is sufficiently below the speed of sound).
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Back
Top