Lifting Baby Safely: Calculating Tension in Backbone

  • Thread starter Thread starter bec2008
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lifting Tension
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the tension in a mother's backbone while lifting her baby, considering the forces acting on her upper body and the moment arms involved. The mother’s upper body mass and the baby’s weight are factored into the static equilibrium equation to determine the tension. The user derived an equation but consistently arrived at an incorrect tension value of 19089 Newtons. There is a request for assistance in correcting the calculation and understanding the dynamics involved in lifting safely. The conversation highlights the importance of proper lifting techniques to avoid strain on the spine.
bec2008
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Question:
A mother leans horizontally over the crib to lift her 16.7 kg baby. The moment arm of the baby about the hip joint is b = 0.53 m. Her upper body has a mass of 58.0 kg and a moment arm of t = 0.450 m. The back muscles are equivalent to a single muscle with an angle theta = 11.5° to the horizontal spine giving a moment arm of r = 0.090 m. Calculate the tension in her backbone when she lifts her child. For your own education convert this load into pound weight to appreciate the magnitude of the load on the back muscles and spine. This explains why you should keep the spine upright when lifting.

Attempted Solution:
I chose my system as the upper torso. Then, since it is in static equilibrium, I was able to set the sum of the forces equal to zero. This is the equation I came up with:

Sum Forces = -t*W(upper body) - b*W(baby) + r*T*sin theta = 0

Since they are equal to zero, I changed the equation around:

t*W(upper body) + b*W(baby) = r*T*sin theta

I then solved for T, giving me the following equation:

[t*W(upper body) + b*W(baby)]/r*sin theta = T

I keep coming up with the answer 19089 Newtons, but it is not correct. Any help would be greatly appreciated! (There is a picture, but I'm not sure how to post it. I could use help on that, too!)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Then you pass on the tension to your knee joint.
 
But I think I'm looking for the tension in the backbone...
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top