Light and electric charge constant?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the invariance of electric charge and other physical quantities for all observers, particularly in the context of relativity. Participants explore the implications of this invariance, comparing it to the invariance of the speed of light and the spacetime interval, while also considering the role of four-vectors in these concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that electric charge appears to have the same value for all observers, similar to the speed of light, and question whether this is a coincidence.
  • There is a suggestion that four vectors, such as four-momentum, are invariant and that their norms represent invariant quantities like rest mass.
  • One participant proposes that charge could be represented as a timelike component of a current vector, but acknowledges uncertainty regarding its consistency with established claims about charge invariance.
  • A current density four-vector is introduced, which includes charge density as a component, indicating a potential framework for discussing charge in relativistic terms.
  • It is mentioned that the total charge of an object, represented as an integral of charge density, is invariant, although the proof of this is described as complex.
  • Another participant elaborates on the relationship between scalar and vector quantities in different reference frames, suggesting that invariant quantities can be derived from these relationships.
  • There is curiosity about the existence of a four-vector related to phase that maintains an invariant property, indicating an interest in exploring additional invariant quantities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views regarding the invariance of electric charge and its relationship to other physical quantities. There is no consensus on the deeper implications or the existence of a four-vector specifically for charge, and the discussion remains open-ended with multiple competing ideas.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of proving the invariance of charge and the need for careful consideration of definitions and mathematical formulations. The discussion also reflects a variety of assumptions about the relationships between different physical quantities in the context of relativity.

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
Peter Bergmann (a student of Einsteins) in THE RIDDLE OF GRAVITATION, PAGE 60 notes

... a bodies electric charge has the same value for all observers,...

And here I had been thinking only about the speed of light as invarient.
Is the above coincidence?? I can't tell...

and the space time interval, is also invarient, right??

Are there other entities constant for all observers? Yes, I think four vectors such as "four vector momentum" which in simple terms is E2 - p2 that is (energy)2 - (momentum)2...

I realize these transform (from one reference frame to another) as they do because of the mathematics of the formulations themselves, and the way they fit into relativity, but I can't help wondering if there is any deeper explanation or understanding. Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Naty1 said:
Are there other entities constant for all observers? Yes, I think four vectors such as "four vector momentum" which in simple terms is E2 - p2 that is (energy)2 - (momentum)2...
The norm of four-momentum that you mention is the invariant mass (aka rest mass) which is the same for all observers.

I don't know about charge, I would guess that you could set up a current vector and then charge would be the timelike component, but then that wouldn't go along with Bergmann's comment. There must be some other four-vector that has charge as the norm. I actually haven't done much in the way of relativistic EM.
 
The total charge of an object is [tex]\int\rho d^3 r[/tex]. It is shown in advanced textbooks that this integral is invariant. It is a tricky proof.
 
Naty1 said:
Peter Bergmann (a student of Einsteins) in THE RIDDLE OF GRAVITATION, PAGE 60 notes



And here I had been thinking only about the speed of light as invarient.
Is the above coincidence?? I can't tell...

and the space time interval, is also invarient, right??

Are there other entities constant for all observers? Yes, I think four vectors such as "four vector momentum" which in simple terms is E2 - p2 that is (energy)2 - (momentum)2...

I realize these transform (from one reference frame to another) as they do because of the mathematics of the formulations themselves, and the way they fit into relativity, but I can't help wondering if there is any deeper explanation or understanding. Any ideas?
This is how I understand it (but I'm not sure at all to be correct): take a scalar quantity which depends on the frame of reference, e.g. energy, time difference between events, frequency, ecc., then take a vectorial quantity which depends on the frame of reference and that is related with the first (there exist an equation which involve both) example: energy and momentum or time difference and spatial distance, frequency and wave vector, ecc. Then there must exist a four-vector made with that scalar and that vectorial quantity, which square modulus is invariant, because for the relativity principle, all frames of reference must be equivalent, so the above equation must be valid in every of them. All 4-vectors have this property.

Example: if in a frame of ref. S you find: (c*delta t)^2 = 1.5 + (delta x)^2 + (delta y)^2 + (delta z)^2 then you also have to find: (c*delta t')^2 = 1.5 + (delta x')^2 + (delta y')^2 + (delta z')^2 in another frame of ref. S' , so if you write (c*delta t)^2 - (delta x)^2 + (delta y)^2 + (delta z)^2 you have found an invariant quantity because it's always = 1.5

An intriguing (for me) invariant quantity is Phase. I'd like to know which is the 4-vector which square modulus is the phase.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
6K