Light as a Constant: Examining the Paradox

AI Thread Summary
Light is a constant for all observers due to the fundamental principles of physics, particularly as demonstrated by the Michelson-Morley experiment, which showed that light's speed remains unchanged regardless of the Earth's motion. Unlike everyday objects, such as a baseball, which have velocities that can be added based on the observer's frame of reference, light's speed is invariant and does not follow this additive behavior. The relativistic formula for combining velocities reveals that even at high speeds, the perceived speed of light remains constant at approximately 299,792 kilometers per second. This phenomenon is a cornerstone of Einstein's theory of relativity, which has been confirmed by multiple experiments, including the Kennedy-Thorndike and Ives-Stilwell experiments. The constancy of light is a fundamental aspect of our universe, reflecting the underlying laws of physics.
matt4584
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?
 
Science news on Phys.org
matt4584 said:
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?
You are mistaken about the baseball example: in fact the observer on the ground measures the speed of the baseball to be very slightly less than 50m/s.

If the speed of the train is ##u## and the ball is thrown at speed ##v##, its speed relative to the ground will not be ##u+v##, it will be ##(u+v)/(1+\frac{uv}{c^2})##. This formula has been verified by experiment.

It would be a good exercise to try calculating this for the speeds in your example; you will quickly see why in daily life we never notice that ##(u+v)## is not exactly correct. It's also worth seeing what happens when you set ##v=c##, shining a light forward in the moving train.
 
Last edited:
matt4584 said:
How can light be a constant for any observer? I understand how it fits into equations and what not, but how can it be a constant. If I throw a baseball forward at 10m/s in a train going 40m/s. I perceive it as 10, an observer on the ground would perceive it as 50. Why doesn't the same apply to light? Is there anything else it doesn't apply to?

Because that's the way the universe works. None of us built it. We just found it this way. Cool, isn't it?
 
  • Like
Likes John Park, XZ923 and davenn
matt4584 the classic observation of this is the Michelson Morley experiment where light beams were sent parallel to the rotation of the surface Earth which is also pretty close to the direction of motion of the Earth about the sun and normal to the direction of rotation of the Earth and its direction of rotation about the sun. The velocity of light is measured to be the same in both directions, which it would not be if a medium through which the Earth moved in its motion about the sum had existed. (See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelson–Morley_experiment) for more detail. The Kennedy-Thorndike experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennedy–Thorndike_experiment) directly confirms that the speed of light is constant and with the Ives Stilwell experiment (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ives–Stilwell_experiment) confirms the Lorentz transformation of special relativity.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
Back
Top