ArmChairPhysicist
- 45
- 0
Stand by, mathematics in progress.
The discussion revolves around a calculus problem involving two towers of different heights and a beam of light reflecting off a lake. The original poster is trying to determine the distance from the base of the left tower to the point where the light beam strikes the lake, given the heights of the towers and the distance between them.
Participants are actively working through the problem, with some providing hints and suggestions for sketching the scenario and deriving expressions for the lengths of the light path segments. There is a focus on using calculus to minimize the total distance traveled by the light, and various interpretations of the problem setup are being explored.
There is an emphasis on using calculus rather than physics principles, which has led to some uncertainty about how to incorporate the laws of reflection into the calculus framework. The original poster has indicated a known answer but is seeking to understand the process of arriving at that answer through calculus.
ArmChairPhysicist said:If I recall correctly, because both expressions are of the same power: ^1/2, I can combine them without any issue, correct?
ArmChairPhysicist said:So I have
(7^2 + X^2)^1/2 + (21^2 + (120-x)^2)^1/2 as the total length
ArmChairPhysicist said:View attachment 196037
This is my current equation, and is what I'm attempting to simplify.
I know that my end goal is to isolate X so I can solve, but I need to eliminate those radicals, and I can't figure out how. Any ideas?
ArmChairPhysicist said:View attachment 196037
This is my current equation, and is what I'm attempting to simplify.
I know that my end goal is to isolate X so I can solve, but I need to eliminate those radicals, and I can't figure out how. Any ideas?
Well, the answer is yes, since you have done exactly what I suggested. However: please do not continually ask questions as to whether your next step is correct or not---just work it all out, from beginning to the end (or, at least, as FAR as you can). Try to develop some confidence in your own work.ArmChairPhysicist said:View attachment 196047 To this?
ArmChairPhysicist said:The 141 came from me taking the derivative of 21^2+(120-x)2
2 • 21 ^2-1 =
42
(120-x)^2 = 2(120-X)^1 correct?