Light Diffraction Homework: 2 Wavelengths & Angle of Coincidence

  • Thread starter Thread starter pat666
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
AI Thread Summary
The problem involves light with two wavelengths differing by 160 nm passing through a diffraction grating with 250,000 lines per meter. The third-order maximum of one wavelength coincides with the fourth-order maximum of the other. The calculations confirm that the wavelengths are approximately 640 nm and 480 nm, with the angle of diffraction at about 28.69 degrees. The value for the grating spacing (d) was verified to be correct at 4 x 10^-6 m. The solution effectively demonstrates the relationship between the wavelengths and their respective diffraction orders.
pat666
Messages
703
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



12 Light consisting of two wavelengths which differ by 160 nm passes through a diffraction grating with 2.50 x 105 lines per metre. In the diffracted light, the third order of one wavelength coincides with the fourth of the other. What are the two wavelengths and at what angle of diffraction does this coincidence occur?

Homework Equations



y=n\lambdaL/d I think is what I should be looking at??

The Attempt at a Solution


\Delta\lambda=160*10^-9
d=1/2.5*10^5 = 4*10-6 not sure if this part is right
If my d is right I think that what I should do next is
y3=3*\lambda*L/4*10^-6
y4=4*\lambda*L/4*10^-6
these are both bright fringes but maybe one should be dark?
That is as far as I get at the moment!

Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Formula for diffraction grating is

d*sin(θ) = mλ

at the point of coincidence θ is same for both the wavelengths. So

m1λ1 = m2λ2

3*λ1 = 4(λ1- 160)

Solve for λ1. And then proceed to find the other results.
 
Thanks rl.bhat,
\lambda1=6.4*10-7m
\lambda2=4.8*10-7m
assuming my value for d from my 1st post is correct,
3*6.4*10-7=4*10-6 sin (\theta)
\theta=28.69o
Does this seem right, mainly concerned about my value for d??

Thanks
 
You are right.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top