Light Entering Black Hole: Observed or Not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter spidey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blackhole Light
AI Thread Summary
Light cannot escape from black holes, but direct observation of light entering and disappearing has not been achieved. Black holes have been inferred through studies of high-energy phenomena, such as quasars and X-ray binaries, which indicate the presence of massive, invisible objects. X-ray binaries provide evidence for black holes formed from stellar collapse, with normal stars transferring matter that emits X-rays detectable by telescopes. Indirect evidence suggests matter falls into black holes without hitting a material surface, supporting their existence. Observations of stellar motion in galactic cores further indicate the presence of supermassive black holes, including one in the Milky Way.
spidey
Messages
213
Reaction score
0
this may be very silly question but i want to confirm with you guys...Its been said when light goes into black hole it can't escape but do we have any proof or observation for light entering a black hole and disappearing..has anyone observed light entering black hole and disappearing?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Until recently, black holes were only a theoretical curiosity with no observational support. Now, the presence of black holes has been inferred in numerous studies from various high-energy phenomena such as quasars, X-ray binary systems and the motion of stars in the inner Galaxy. Nobody has ever directly observed the blackness of a black hole though, but the next generation of optical interferometric telescopes should be able to come close.
 
Well, one thing about black holes is that if you detect an extremely massive object and you can't see it, that's because it's a black hole. It's not so much the light going in and not coming back out that matters, but the fact that it isn't generating any itself. Before supernova: bright star. After supernova: nothing visible, but presence of a massive object still detectable.
 
russ_watters said:
Well, one thing about black holes is that if you detect an extremely massive object and you can't see it, that's because it's a black hole. It's not so much the light going in and not coming back out that matters, but the fact that it isn't generating any itself. Before supernova: bright star. After supernova: nothing visible, but presence of a massive object still detectable.


Do we have any solid proof or observations that there are heavy massive objects but not visible? how can we know that there is a massive object?
 
Observations of X-ray binaries provide evidence for black holes formed from stellar collapse. An X-ray binary, so named because it emits X-ray radiation, consists of a dark compact object orbited by a normal star.

Pairs of stars often orbit each other in binary systems. If massive enough, one star of the pair may collapse, while the other member of the pair remains a normal star. A normal star orbiting closely around a black hole can transfer matter to the black hole. The temperature of the infalling matter increases as it approaches the black hole, until it glows strongly with X-rays that can often be detected easily by telescopes orbiting the Earth.

So, X-ray binaries supply prime candidates for black holes, but dark compact objects other than black holes might also emit X-rays. However, a compact object more massive than about two solar masses has too much mass to be either a white dwarf or neutron star, and consequently must be a black hole. Observations of the normal star's orbital velocity give estimates for the masses of both objects in an X-ray binary. Compact objects in several observed X-ray binaries have masses that fall in range required for black holes.

Comparatively new results published in 2003 seem to indicate that in certain systems, matter falls directly into a compact object without hitting a material surface. Since black holes do not have a material surface, this gives strong indirect evidence that the matter is falling into a black hole.

Observations of the orbital motion of stars and other objects about the central cores of galaxies suggest strongly that supermassive objects reside in galactic cores. The small sizes of galactic cores suggest strongly that the supermassive objects must be black holes. Our own galaxy, the Milky Way, has a three million solar mass black hole in its core.
 
Thank you all for explaining..
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Back
Top