Light from Sun to Earth in seconds

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a middle school student's inquiry about calculating the time it takes for light to travel from the Sun to Earth, using the speed of light and the distance involved. The student initially arrives at an incorrect answer of 4.99 x 10^5 seconds due to a miscalculation in dividing the distance by the speed of light. A participant points out that the error stems from incorrectly handling the results of the calculator's output, leading to confusion in the powers of ten notation. The correct approach should yield an answer of approximately 500 seconds, not 4.99 x 10^5. The student expresses gratitude for the clarification and acknowledges the mistake.
Zack
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm a middle school student who enjoys astronomy and I volunteer at a local science center. At that science center I have no trouble answering questions about the visual aspect of astronomy, but I do run into some trouble when I am asked about the "techy" or mathmatical side of the science. Therefore, I went to the local used book store and picked up "Universe (fifth edition)" to enhance my knowledge of some of the mathmatical formulas used in astronomy. I'm having a bit of difficulty answering this question:

The speed of light is 3.00 x 10^8 m/s. How long does it take light to travel from the Sun to Earth? Give your answer in seconds, using powers-of-ten notation.

The answer is 4.99 x 10^2

As far as I can tell, I have not overlooked anything in the chapter. Here is my work and my answer (1.496 x 10^8 being the distance from the Earth to the sun in meters)

Step 1- 1.496 x 10^11m = (3.00 x 10^8m/s)(t)

Step 2- 1.496 x 10^11m / 3.00 x 10^8m/s= t

Step 3- 499m/s x 10^3s = t

Step 4- 4.99 x 10^5s = t

Answer- 4.99 x 10^5s= t

What am I doing wrong here?

Forgive me if this thread is redundant, in the wrong forum, or too easy to for an answer :biggrin:

Thanks,
Zack
 
Physics news on Phys.org
1.496 / 3.00 is not 499.

I think I know what you did:

I bet you asked your calculator to compute:

(1.496 x 10^11) / (3.00 x 10^8)

to which it replied `499'.

Then, you computed 10^11 / 10^8 = 10^3.

And then said the answer was 499 x 10^3.

But you already asked your calculator to deal with that part -- so it was wrong to do it again.
 
Last edited:
O, sorry, I checked my work several times and thought I had cleared it of careless errors. Thanks!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top