1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Light in a mirror box

  1. Nov 19, 2011 #1
    not sure if this is posted,

    so imagine i have a 3- dimensional cube. lets say its about 10m x 10m x 10m in volume. this cube is empty on the inside but its inner surface is covered with mirrors. normal plane mirrors all around the walls, like tiles but instead mirrors. so what happens if i switch on a light bulb inside this box and immediately switch it off. will the light escape when i can ensure that there is not a single hole / leak available for the light to escape. or in other words. will the light be still bouncing around in the cube even after the light source is switched off?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 19, 2011 #2

    Integral

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    Since there is no such thing as a perfect mirror the light, being adsorped by the mirrors, will be gone in a few nanosecsonds.
     
  4. Nov 19, 2011 #3
    Will there not be some absorption at each single reflection?

    And light travels so fast that the number of absorptions will be so high!

    So the energy is absorbed so fast.
     
  5. Nov 19, 2011 #4
    mirrors absorb light? thats new to me.
    well then, is there any surface that totally reflects light?
     
  6. Nov 20, 2011 #5

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    there ya go learn something new every day. :)
    Only a percentage of the light is reflected maybe as low as 50% maybe as high as 90%

    zoom onto the surface of the mirror and at the microscopic level there's likely to be significant spaces between the "blobs' of reflecting material deposited on the glass/other material. All those spaces/gaps are places where the incident light is going to get through and either be absorbed by the glass or "transmitted" through and out the other side.

    not that I'm personally aware of.
    some of the best mirrors are produced for astronomical telescopes and they are often ~ 90%
    its all depends on wavelength as well
    have a look at this wiki entry.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_coating" [Broken]

    cheers
    Dave
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 5, 2017
  7. Nov 20, 2011 #6
    alright, thanks alot for the info and the link too of course.

    cheers.
     
  8. Jan 27, 2013 #7
    How would the reflective ability of a pool of mercury compair to a mirror?

    Ratchettrack
     
  9. Jan 27, 2013 #8

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Clean mercury was what they used to use for mirrors in the old days (on the back of the glass with paint behind it) . So it obviously works tolerably well. But it does rely on the mercury surface being uncontaminated. One reason they don't use it now is that it's toxic but the main reason is that there are better coatings. Real mercury mirrors always look a wierd colour to me - but the ones you can see are all antiques. The reflectivity to optical light is only about 75%, apparently.
     
  10. Jan 27, 2013 #9

    Bobbywhy

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    A Google search for “high reflectivity first surface mirrors” brought many results. Here are some specifications from one manufacturer:

    Dielectric High Reflection Front Surface Mirrors
    Highest reflection in the visible range
    Reflection Properties
    Ravg > 99% at 425-680nm at 45°
    Ravg > 97% bei 400-690nm at 45°
    http://www.pgo-online.com/intl/katalog/shr_dielectric_mirror.html

    So even if you built your mirror box using these (imperfect) mirrors, the light would rapidly diminish in amplitude and would disappear very soon.

    Cheers,
    Bobbywhy
     
  11. Jan 28, 2013 #10

    jbriggs444

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If one assumes 99% reflectivity then that's 100 reflections to reduce by a factor of 1/e in intensity. In a 10x10x10 meter cube, something like 1 km total distance. At 300,000 km/second, around 3 microseconds.

    That's about 30 times faster than a good quality photographic strobe.
     
  12. Jan 28, 2013 #11

    Low-Q

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    The structure of a mirror surface might reflect light as well if the wavelengt is considerably longer than the distance between the spaces in the structure. You can use a metal grid to reflect radiowaves pretty well, even if there is visible small holes in that reflector.

    In your microwave oven you have a grid like that on the door window. The microwaves do almost not escape from that door even if 50% of the door is open holes. Visible light pass throug because the wavelengt is much shorter. (What I have learned)

    That said, there is no such thing as a perfect mirror - yet.

    Vidar
     
  13. Jan 28, 2013 #12

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    It's interesting to compare signal attenuation in an optical fibre which carries light over thousands of km, involving multiple TIR reflections- plus all that glass.
     
  14. Jan 28, 2013 #13
    Don't they have to amplify the signal on long runs to maintain it? I would think that the lights energy loss would be less because its reflection off the inside of the fiber is more of a ricochet.I also would think that all that glass doesn't matter too much because none of the light seems to escape out the side of the fiber. That makes me think that all the glass is doing is slowing down the light by increasing its wavelength and leaving some energy behind. The extra energy must go into the fiber in the form of heat. Does that then mean that the amount of heat build up in the fiber is equal to the lights energy loss or is there something else picking up some of the energy.

    Ratchettrack
     
  15. Jan 28, 2013 #14

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    I think you should read a bit about optical fibres before trying to make a contribution about something so sophisticated.
    What's a "ricochet" when applied to total internal reflection? Do you know anything about Total Internal Reflection?
     
  16. Jan 28, 2013 #15
    Dear Ravalanche,

    The idea of enclosing light in a cavity with reflecting walls is very old. In fact there is intense search for high-Q cavities. Q or the quality factor is a measurement of the goodness of a resonator, and it is related to the decay time (dacay being cause due to losses). Optical fibers already mentioned are one way of making such a device. Another one is using photonic crystals. However, the best resonators are so called whispering gallery resonators (named so after their acoustic analogs in the form of some architectural constructions) whose Q-s are much above those of any other device.

    Just to give you an idea of their construction:

    http://www.google.es/search?hl=es&q...29,d.d2k&fp=b373a558ebf917cd&biw=1366&bih=653
     
  17. Jan 28, 2013 #16
    But is there a [conservation] law in nature that says an ideal mirror is not allowed?

    Even if such a reflective surface is permitted by nature, the Compton Effect would cause the wavelength of the light bulb's emitted light to eventually increase to ∞...
     
  18. Jan 28, 2013 #17

    Low-Q

    User Avatar
    Gold Member

    Different metals reflect light differently. A reflective surface for visible light might absorb most of light with shorter or longer wavelength. Dont know about any law except it would be impossible with more than 100% reflective.

    If the mirrors in the cube really was reflecting 100% the energy will stop increasing as soon as the bulb shuts off. Then the cube will act as a capacitor which stores the electromagnetic radiation inside it.
     
  19. Jan 28, 2013 #18

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    not really ;)

    in reality, for practical data transmissions, distances between repeaters is quite low ( depending on the data transmission speed)
    Optical fibre systems I was installing with Telecom in New Zealand, had repeaters at 10km separation
    Have a look here for some Bit Error Rate and attenuation calculations

    Dave
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
  20. Jan 28, 2013 #19
    Well, I didn't state things as a fact but instead as what i was thinking. I'm looking for insite here. Are you inferring that you should only post on this forum if you know all the answers already? If everyone who post already knows all the facts and are not allowed to inquire, then what is the reason for the forum. I joined this forum to learn something but your indicating that is unacceptable. My post wasn't to make a contribution other then stimulating though. I don't claim to have the answers. Besides a contribution is worthless unless there is someone on the other end to benifit from it in some way. As far as this thread goes, I'm the one on the other end. I'm not in the position to act like I know everything and figure if someone else doesn't know something, their an idiot. Ricochet is when something strikes a boundry at an angle and rebounds back off the boundry without going thru it. Isn't that kind of what the light is doing in the fiber?

    Ratchettrack
     
  21. Jan 28, 2013 #20

    davenn

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    yes it is, but its just not a term used to describe the interaction of light with other objects :)
    In this instance, reflection is the term more commonly used

    yup its all live and learn, and compared to some of the "heavyweights of physics" on this forum, I'm just a young lad haha

    Dave
     
    Last edited: Jan 28, 2013
  22. Jan 29, 2013 #21

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    I understand that 100km is the sort of spacing, using the newer (0.2dB/km) fibres. That is fairly 'stunning', in my estimation. Obviously, attenuation is not the only problem and bandwidth also needs to be considered - but we were only discussing losses in this thread.
     
  23. Jan 29, 2013 #22

    sophiecentaur

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member
    2017 Award

    Perhaps I made a slightly grumpy reply - sorry. But there were two 'new' ideas in my post. (Clearly new to you, at any rate) I used the term TIR and the notion of a very long path length absorption. Presumably you were sitting with your browser, reading that post and a 'considered' response would surely require a bit of a look elsewhere to see what TIR is and to look at light losses in glass. Wiki is a good first go for most questions (instant expert). Or at least, you could have asked what I meant by TIR (which, of course, relies entirely on oblique incidence on the surface - look it up). If you have ever looked at the edge of a sheet of ordinary glass you must have noticed that even a few cm thickness reduces the transmitted light level so these fibres are very impressively low loss in comparison.

    Also, the light doesn't "slow up" on the way through and its wavelength remains the same. Yes, the lost light energy will turn up as heat - but spread over many km of fibre so it would be hard to detect.
     
  24. Jan 29, 2013 #23
    Thanks, I'm a high school guy that has worked a lot with physics. Have several patents and have worked out a complex problem that all the engineers of my competors said couldn't be done. Most people that know me think I'm an engineer. Got them fooled. I'm from a family of engineers. That said, I'm not in the class of most on here and don't have the formal training. As a result, I don't know the proper terms but I do have a pretty good sense for the concepts. You might say I'm a jack of many areas but a master of none. I'm also sorry for retaliating as aggressively as I did. Guess that comes from my insecure years. Anyway I want to thank all of you for your guidance on this Light Box thread. I gained a lot of insite.

    If anyone is interested in the complex problem I worked out, just say so and I post a new thread presenting the problem.

    To your final statements, if heat is produced but the light doesn't slow down and its wavelength remains the same, where does the heat energy then come form?

    Ratchettrack
     
  25. Jan 29, 2013 #24

    Khashishi

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    The heat comes from photons that were absorbed. The light intensity drops
     
  26. Jan 29, 2013 #25
    The short answer is the box will get slightly warmer, as the optical energy is reduced
    to longer and longer IR wavelengths.
    At some point the components of the mirror become a black body, and it all turns to heat.
    The same question could be stated for computers, what percentage of each watt going into a computer turns to heat, effectively 100%, as the computer does no real work.
     
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Loading...