Light in the wake of huge objects

  • Thread starter Thread starter gibbiextreme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
gibbiextreme
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
ok, this is going to be my science fair experiment, so tell me if you see any holes in it:

if a huge planet or star is moving away from where you are standing, and a beam of light is fired not at it, but near it. due to the fact that light tends to bend towards gravity, would it be possible that light would curve into a ark in the wake of the planet to where you would never observe the light at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Unless the beam of light hits something and reflects off of it, then there is no chance of you observing it since it will continue to travel away from you point of observation and never come back for you to observe it.
 


Your hypothesis is certainly interesting and could potentially lead to some interesting results. However, there are a few factors that you may want to consider in your experiment.

Firstly, the effect of gravity on light is known as gravitational lensing, and it is a well-studied phenomenon. It occurs when light passes near a massive object, causing it to bend and appear distorted. However, this effect is typically observed when the light is passing very close to the object, such as in the case of a galaxy or cluster of galaxies. In the scenario you have described, the light is not passing close enough to the planet or star to experience significant gravitational lensing.

Additionally, the speed of light is incredibly fast, and it would likely not be affected by the gravitational pull of the planet or star in the way you have described. The light would continue to travel in a straight line, even if it were slightly bent by gravity. This means that it would still be observable, even if it appeared slightly distorted.

Lastly, the angle at which the light is fired near the planet or star would also play a role in its path and visibility. If the light is fired at a steep angle, it may not be affected by the gravitational pull at all, and would continue on its original path. However, if it is fired at a shallow angle, it may experience some bending, but it would still likely be observable.

Overall, your experiment idea is intriguing, but it may need some further refinement and consideration of these factors in order to accurately test your hypothesis. Good luck with your science fair project!
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top