Light reflection from edge of universe

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of a boundary in the universe and its implications for light reflection and redshift. It suggests that if a boundary exists due to gravitational pull, light could slow down and return to us, potentially affecting our observations of distant stars. However, there is a strong counterargument stating that the universe has no edge or center, and any perceived boundaries are more akin to an event horizon. The conversation highlights the speculative nature of these ideas, with participants acknowledging the complexity of the topic. Ultimately, the discussion reflects ongoing debates about the universe's structure and the behavior of light within it.
asimations
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
tif we presume that our finite universe has a boundry. This boundry is due to the pull of gravity. Light will slow down and then come back to us. 'i may be absolutely wrong in this'. My question is that the light we see will be from the stars surface that doesn't face us and star moving away from us as it hasnt reached the boundry yet. What will be the red shift value of this light.
 
Space news on Phys.org
There is no boundary!
 
The universe has no edge or "center".
 
i guess it has event horizon that is like an edge
 
This is turning into speculation piling on more speculation.
 

Thread 'Matter density right after the decoupling'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
View full post »

Thread 'Rutgers finds a transparent Einstein Cross - apparently a dark matter "halo".'

The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
View full post »

Thread 'Hubble Constant, Dark Energy and the Expanding Universe'

Why was the Hubble constant assumed to be decreasing and slowing down (decelerating) the expansion rate of the Universe, while at the same time Dark Energy is presumably accelerating the expansion? And to thicken the plot. recent news from NASA indicates that the Hubble constant is now increasing. Can you clarify this enigma? Also., if the Hubble constant eventually decreases, why is there a lower limit to its value?
View full post »

Similar threads

I How do you get to the conclusion that there is accelerating expansion?
Replies
23
Views
2K
Will light get reflected at edge of space
Replies
4
Views
2K
I What if the Universe expands faster than the speed of light?
Replies
19
Views
4K
B Clarification on how old the Universe is
Replies
11
Views
3K
B How did expansion take 380,000 years to let light travel freely?
Replies
13
Views
3K
I Brian Cox and the end of the Universe?
Replies
13
Views
5K
B Cosmological Redshift in Simulated Universe
Replies
39
Views
5K
B Question regarding light from distant objects
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Why do we still see the CMB today?
3
Replies
103
Views
10K
B The known universe is expanding?
Replies
6
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top