Pjpic
- 235
- 1
If the universe had stayed the size of a baseball, would it have taken light 13.5 billion years to travel across it?
The universe has never been "the size of a baseball" so I'm not clear why you are asking what would have happened if it has "stayed" that size.Pjpic said:If the universe had stayed the size of a baseball, would it have taken light 13.5 billion years to travel across it?
I don't know, maybe something about how the density(?) of spacetime effects light.student07 said:What is your thought about it?
This posits an incorrect assumption that spacetime is an "ether". It is not.Pjpic said:I don't know, maybe something about how the density(?) of spacetime effects light.
Pjpic said:If the universe had stayed the size of a baseball
Pjpic said:something about how the density(?) of spacetime effects light.
PeterDonis said:The universe, as best we can tell, is spatially infinite, so, as phinds said, it has never been "the size of a baseball".
Spacetime doesn't have a density. The matter and energy present in spacetime does, but spacetime itself doesn't.
Pjpic said:If the currently visible universe had stopped expanding at an earlier time
Pjpic said:would the greater energy density cause light to take the same 13.5 b.l.y. to traverse the radius?