How Does the Doppler Effect Alter Light's Wavelength in Space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rocephin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Space
rocephin
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
1. The problem statement:


My problem is regarding doppler effect for light . I have read in textbook that blue/red shift occurs in case of light when it travels from a star to Earth .

Q no 1:
Now, in case of sound it is easy to under stand that sound wave comprise of rarefaction and compression , in this way as a result of continuous compression and rarefaction , the energy of sound waves get reduced and that reduction appears as wave length shortening.

But in case of light how wave length gets reduced?
Is energy lost during motion?

Q2:
If light travels travels from point A in space to point B, does it approach point B with a frequency and wavelength different from frequency and wavelength it had while initially moving?



HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i don't think you understand the doppler effect properly

In sound the motion of the emitter respective to the receiver is what causes the Doppler effect. In the simplest terms: If something stationary emits a signal every second then the distance between the signals would be its velocity 'v' times one second. if the emitter then starts moving with velocity 'b' in the direction of the signal then the distance between each signal would be v-c times one second i.e. it's wavelength has been shortened. So it is the motion as well as the gravitational field of the stars that governs the redshift
 
Last edited:
What I am saying is that as wavelength of a sinusoidal wave is the spatial period of the wave – the distance over which the wave's shape repeats , then frequency or number of waves passing through a point should change , not wavelength.
 
hi rocephin! :smile:
rocephin said:
Now, in case of sound it is easy to under stand that sound wave comprise of rarefaction and compression , in this way as a result of continuous compression and rarefaction , the energy of sound waves get reduced and that reduction appears as wave length shortening.

the sound wave does not lose energy

the number of wave-tops passing a stationary point per second is obviously less than the number passing a point that is moving towards the wave …

ie the frequency increases (blue-shift)

and if the point is moving away, the frequency decreases (red-shift) …

(same for any wave, including light)

it's just geometry! :wink:
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top