Likelyhood ratio test hypotheses and normal distribution

Hummingbird25
Messages
84
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Given the normal distribution

X_{ij} \sim N(\mu_i, \omega^2) where i = 1,2 and j = 1,...,n

deduce that H_{0\mu}: \mu_1 = \mu _2

The Attempt at a Solution



Do I take in the Likelyhood function here?

and use it to analyse the case?

Sincerely Hummingbird

p.s. I have reading in Wiki that the Null hypo is rejected by the likehood ratio test, could be what I am expected to show here?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hummingbird25 said:
I have reading in Wiki that the Null hypo is rejected by the likehood ratio test, could be what I am expected to show here?
You are taking 2 samples from 2 different normal distributions, where sample size is n for each sample. You are supposed to calculate the sample averages then test the null hyp. using a z-test, assuming their common variance \omega^2 is known (given).

If you don't know the variance you'll need to estimate it from the combined sample, then use a t-test for equality of means (assuming equal variances and equal sample sizes).
 
Last edited:
EnumaElish said:
You are taking 2 samples from 2 different normal distributions, where sample size is n for each sample. You are supposed to calculate the sample averages then test the null hyp. using a z-test, assuming their common variance \omega^2 is known (given).

If you don't know the variance you'll need to estimate it from the combined sample, then use a t-test for equality of means (assuming equal variances and equal sample sizes).

The sample average of the two norm distributions is that

\overline{x} = \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{2}f_i}{n}??

Sincerely
Hummingbird
 
Last edited:
No.

\overline{x_1} = \frac{\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{1j}}{n}

Same for i = 2.
 
Hello again EnomaElish and thank you,

\overline{x_1} = \frac{\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{1j}}{n}

\overline{x_2} = \frac{\sum_{j=1}^{n}x_{2j}}{n}

Then I say by the z-test then the null hypotheses is rejected if the variance isn't given since the samples aren't drawn from the same population.

But the null hypotheses is accepted if the means are equal which can be tested using the student t-test.

Is this it?

Sincerely Hummingbird
 
Is the variance given, or assumed known?

Possible answer 1:
Yes, the variance is given (or the problem assumes it is known).
What you need to do: use the z test for equality of means to determine whether or not the two means are equal. (You are not supposed to use the t test in this case.)

Possible answer 2:
No, the variance is not given (nor does the problem assume the variance is known).
What you need to do: calculate the common variance from the combined sample. Then use the t test for equality of means to determine whether or not the two means are equal. (You are not supposed to use the z test in this case.)
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top