Limit help needed for end of complex number question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the sum of the n distinct n-th roots of unity raised to an integer power k equals either 0 or n. When k is not a multiple of n, the sum evaluates to 0 due to the properties of sine functions. Conversely, when k is a multiple of n, the sum equals n, as shown through the simplification of the roots raised to the power k. The participants also explore the continuity of the limit in this case and the behavior of the exponential terms, ultimately confirming that the sum is n for integer multiples of n. The discussion highlights the importance of correctly handling the algebraic expressions involved in the proof.
EdMel
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


43. Let ##w_1, w_2, ... , w_n## be the ##n## distinct ##n##'th roots of unity ##(n\geq0)##. Show that if ##k## is an integer then $$w_1^k+w_2^k+...+w_n^k$$ equals ##0## or ##n##. Find the values of ##k## for which the sum is ##n##.

Hint:Write the roots in polar form and sum the resulting geometric progression.

Homework Equations


It has been shown elsewhere that $$1-e^{i\theta}=e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}.-2i.\sin{\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)}$$
which has been derived from Euler's formula $$e^{i\theta}=\cos\theta+i\sin\theta.$$

The Attempt at a Solution


Note: My problems start with Case 2 at the end of my solution. I have questions after the end of my solution.

Solution:

In polar form the ##n##'th roots of unity can be written as $$w_l=e^{i\pi\frac{(2l-n)}{n}}$$ for ##l=1## to ##n##.

Let the sum in the question be ##S_n## then this can be written in polar form as
$$S_n=\left(e^{i\pi\frac{(2.1-n)}{n}}\right)^k+\left(e^{i\pi\frac{(2.2-n)}{n}}\right)^k+...\left(e^{i\pi\frac{(2.n-n)}{n}}\right)^k.$$ There is a common factor of $$e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}$$ so we can take this out side brackets to get
$$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}
\left(1+e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}+...+e^{i\pi\frac{2(n-1)k}{n}}\right).$$
We have a geometric progression in the brackets with a ratio of ##e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}## so we can now write the sum as
$$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}.\frac{1-\left(e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}\right)^n}{1-\left(e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}\right)}
=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}.\frac{1-e^{i\pi2k}}{1-e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}}.$$

As $$1-e^{i\theta}=e^{i\frac{\theta}{2}}.-2i.\sin{\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right)}$$ the sum can be written as
$$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}.
\frac{e^{i\pi k}.-2i.\sin{(\pi k)}} {e^{\frac{i\pi k}{n}}.-2i.\sin{(\frac{\pi k}{n})}}
=e^{i\pi\frac{k}{n}}.\frac{\sin{(\pi k)}} {\sin{(\pi\frac{k}{n})}}.$$

I now split up the solution into two cases.

Case 1 - The integer ##k## is not an integer multiple of ##n##.

In this case ##\sin{(\pi k)}=0## (it always will as ##k## in an integer), ##\sin{(\pi\frac{k}{n})}\neq0## as ##n## is not a factor of ##k## and ##\frac{k}{n}## does not reduce to an integer, so ##S_n=0##.

Case 2 - The integer ##k## is an integer multiple of ##n##.

Let ##k=qn## where ##q\in\mathbb Z##. The problem here is that both ##\sin{(\pi k)}## and ##\sin{(\pi\frac{k}{n})}## equal zero, so we have the indeterminate form ##\frac{0}{0}## in ##S_n##.

You can check the limit of ##S_n## as ##q\rightarrow0##
$$\lim_{q\rightarrow0}\left(e^{i\pi\frac{k}{n}}. \frac{\sin{(\pi k)}} {\sin{(\pi\frac{k}{n})}}\right)=
\lim_{q\rightarrow0}\left(e^{i\pi\frac{qn}{n}}. \frac{\sin{(\pi qn)}} {\sin{(\pi\frac{qn}{n})}}\right)=
\lim_{q\rightarrow0} \left(e^{i\pi q}. \frac{\sin{(\pi qn)}} {\sin{(\pi q)}}\right),$$
and then
$$=\lim_{q\rightarrow0}e^{i\pi q}.
\lim_{q\rightarrow0} \left(\frac{\sin{(\pi qn)}} {\pi qn} \right).
\lim_{q\rightarrow0} \left(\frac{\pi q}{\sin{(\pi q)}}\right).
\lim_{q\rightarrow0} n =
1.1.1.n=n\qquad.\Box$$

This is as far as I have got. My problems now are
1) How do I prove Case 2 for the general situation when ##q## is any integer?
2) How do I show that the limit in Case 2 is continuous?
3) How so I deal with the fact that ##e^{i\pi q}## flips between ##\pm1## depending if ##q## is odd or even? I guess question 3) here will be answered by 1) and 2) depending on the sign of the sin limits.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi EdMel! :smile:

patient to doctor: doctor, it hurts when i do that

doctor to patient: then don't do that! :biggrin:

EdMel said:
Case 2 - The integer ##k## is an integer multiple of ##n##.

Let ##k=qn## … we have the indeterminate form ##\frac{0}{0}## in ##S_n##.

so don't use Sn :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi EdMel! :smile:

patient to doctor: doctor, it hurts when i do that

doctor to patient: then don't do that! :biggrin:



so don't use Sn :wink:


Hi tiny-tim,

I can see that for Case 2 its easer to use $$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}\left(1+e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}+...+e^{i\pi \frac{2(n-1)k}{n}}\right)$$ instead of reducing this to include the sin functions. Substituting in ##k=nq## gives
$$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)nq}{n}}\left(1+e^{i\pi\frac{2nq}{n}}+...+e^{i\pi \frac{2(n-1)nq}{n}}\right)=e^{i\pi2q}.e^{i\pi(-nq)}\left(1+e^{i\pi2q}+...+e^{i\pi2(n-1)q}\right),$$
all the ##e^{i\theta}## terms with an even integer multiple of ##\pi## as an argument are equal to 1
$$S_n=1.e^{i\pi(-nq)}(1+1+...+1)=e^{i\pi(-nq)}.n\qquad,$$
which still has ##S_n## flipping between ##-n## and ##n## depending on ##k## being and odd or even integer multiple of ##n##.

Maybe my algebra was wrong some-where? I have checked it several times though.

Thanks,

Ed
 
EdMel said:
Hi tiny-tim,

I can see that for Case 2 its easer to use $$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)k}{n}}\left(1+e^{i\pi\frac{2k}{n}}+...+e^{i\pi \frac{2(n-1)k}{n}}\right)$$ instead of reducing this to include the sin functions. Substituting in ##k=nq## gives
$$S_n=e^{i\pi\frac{(2-n)nq}{n}}\left(1+e^{i\pi\frac{2nq}{n}}+...+e^{i\pi \frac{2(n-1)nq}{n}}\right)=e^{i\pi2q}.e^{i\pi(-nq)}\left(1+e^{i\pi2q}+...+e^{i\pi2(n-1)q}\right),$$
all the ##e^{i\theta}## terms with an even integer multiple of ##\pi## as an argument are equal to 1
$$S_n=1.e^{i\pi(-nq)}(1+1+...+1)=e^{i\pi(-nq)}.n\qquad,$$
which still has ##S_n## flipping between ##-n## and ##n## depending on ##k## being and odd or even integer multiple of ##n##.

Maybe my algebra was wrong some-where? I have checked it several times though.

Thanks,

Ed

I just realized I'm over complicating things.

From the question and with ##k=nq## we have
$$w_1^k+w_2^k+...+w_n^k=w_1^{nq}+w_2^{nq}+...+w_n^{nq}=(w_1^n)^q+(w_2^n)^q+...+(w_n^n)^q=(1)^q+(1)^q+...+(1)^q=n.\Box$$

In my original solution I have subtracted ##\pi## from the arguments of the n'th roots so they fit in the range ##(-\pi,\pi]## and I think this has stuffed me up.
 
:biggrin:
 
Back
Top