Limit of Series: $\frac{1}{n}$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vitor Pimenta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit Series
Vitor Pimenta
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
What should be the limit of the following series (if any ...)

\frac{{1 + \frac{1}{2} + \frac{1}{3} + ... + \frac{1}{n}}}{n}
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Technically, this is not a series but a sequence.

That aside, one way to get the answer is to use, for ##k\geq 2, \frac{1}{k}=\int_{k-1}^k\frac{dx}{k}\leq \int_{k-1}^k \frac{dx}{x} ## .
 
I have just found here that, given a sequence {\left\{ {{a_n}} \right\}_{n = 1}}^\infty, \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } {a_n} = L \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\frac{{{a_1} + {a_2} + {a_3} + ... + {a_n}}}{n}} \right) = L

Instant answer ¬¬'
 
Ah yes, even simpler you're right : )
 
Vitor Pimenta said:
I have just found here that, given a sequence {\left\{ {{a_n}} \right\}_{n = 1}}^\infty, \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } {a_n} = L \Rightarrow \mathop {\lim }\limits_{n \to \infty } \left( {\frac{{{a_1} + {a_2} + {a_3} + ... + {a_n}}}{n}} \right) = L

Instant answer ¬¬'

I don't see how that follows actually. Use that for every ##\epsilon > 0##, there is an ##N## such that ##|a_n-L| < \epsilon##. Then for all ##n## larger than ##N##,
##|\frac{a_1 + ... + a_n}{n} - L| = |\frac{a_1 + ... + a_N}{n} + \frac{(a_{N+1}-L) + ...+ (a_n-L)}{n}| \leq |\frac{a_1 + ... + a_N}{n}| + |\frac{(a_{N+1}-L)}{n}| + ...+ |\frac{(a_n-L)}{n}| < |\frac{a_1 + ... + a_N}{n}| + \frac{\epsilon}{n} + ... + \frac{\epsilon}{n} = |\frac{a_1 + ... + a_N}{n}| + \epsilon.##

As ##n \to \infty##, the expression ##|\frac{a_1 + ... + a_N}{n}|## will converge to 0. In particular, there is some N' such that for all n larger than N', we have ## |\frac{a_1 + ... + a_N}{n}| < \epsilon##. Thus we find that choosing N' large enough (bigger than N), we will have for any chosen ##\epsilon > 0## and for all n larger than N', that ##|\frac{a_1 + ... + a_n}{n} - L| < 2\epsilon## proving that ## \lim_{n \to \infty} |\frac{a_1 + ... + a_n}{n} - L| = 0##.

Note: edited
 
Last edited:
I know this, it's called Cesaro's theorem.
For the proof you can write: ## |(\frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^n a_k) - L | \le \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=1}^N |a_k - L| + \frac{1}{n}\sum_{k=N+1}^n |a_k - L| ##

The first term tends to 0 as n tends to infinity.
The second term is bounded by ##\frac{n-N}{n} \varepsilon ## for N big enough
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top