Limit problem using l'hopital's rule

In summary, the problem was that you needed to do the derivative of the top over the derivative of the bottom right, but in this case you can just use the product rule.
  • #1
584
0

Homework Statement



[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{x\sqrt{x-1}-2}{x-2}[/tex]


Homework Equations



calculate the limit

The Attempt at a Solution



When I apply l'hopital's i have to do derivative of the top over derivative of the bottom right?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
mtayab1994 said:

Homework Statement



[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow2}\frac{x\sqrt{x-1}-2}{x-2}[/tex]


Homework Equations



calculate the limit

The Attempt at a Solution



When I apply l'hopital's i have to do derivative of the top over derivative of the bottom right?
Yes .
 
  • #3
You could use L'Hopital but I would consider that "overkill". Instead, rationalize the numerator and factor:

[tex]\frac{x\sqrt{x- 1}- 2}{x- 2}\frac{x\sqrt{x- 1}+ 2}{x\sqrt{x- 1}+ 2}= \frac{x^2(x- 1)- 4}{(x- 2)(x\sqrt{x- 1}+ 2)}= \frac{x^3- x^2- 4}{(x- 1)(x\sqrt{x- 1}+ 2)}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{(x- 2)(x^2+ x+ 2)}{(x- 2)(x\sqrt{x- 1}- 2)}= \frac{x^2+ x+ 2}{x\sqrt{x- 1}+ 2}[/tex]

Now, let x= 2.

(We knew it would factor that way precisely because x= 2 made both numerator and denominator equal to 0.)
 
  • #4
Another alternative:


[tex]Let \ x \ =\ y^2 + 1.[/tex]



[tex]As \ \ x\to 2, \ \ y \to 1.[/tex]


[tex]\lim_{y \to 1} \dfrac{(y^2 + 1)\sqrt{y^2} - 2}{(y^2 + 1) - 2} \ =[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{y \to 1}\dfrac{|y|(y^2 + 1) - 2}{y^2 - 1} \ = \ [/tex]

[tex]\lim_{y \to 1}\dfrac{y(y^2 + 1) - 2}{y^2 - 1} \ ** \ = \ [/tex]

[tex]\lim_{y \to 1}\dfrac{y^3 + y - 2}{y^2 - 1} \ = \ [/tex]

[tex]\lim_{y \to 1}\dfrac{(y - 1)(y^2 + y + 2)}{(y - 1)(y + 1)} \ = \ [/tex]

[tex]\lim_{y \to 1}\dfrac{y^2 + y + 2}{y + 1}[/tex]


Continue . . .





[tex]** \ Note: \ \ \ As \ \ y \ \ is \ \ positive \ \ near \ \ 1, \ \ |y| = y.[/tex]
 
  • #5
I used L'Hopital's rule, and I think it's actually simpler in this case. The derivative of the denominator is 1, the derivative of the constant 2 is 0 so ...
 
  • #6
zhandele said:
I used L'Hopital's rule,
and I think it's actually simpler in this case.

The derivative of the denominator is 1, [tex] \ \ \ \ Yes, \ \ so \ \ evidently \ \ you're \ \ done \ \ discussing \ \ the \ \ denominator.[/tex]


the derivative of the constant 2 is 0 [tex] \ \ \ \ No, \ \ if \ \ you \ \ are \ \ now \ \ discussing \ \ the \ \ numerator, [/tex][tex] you \ \ are \ \ to \ \ be \ \ taking \ \ the \ \ derivative \ \ of \ \ \ x\sqrt{x - 1} - 2. [/tex]
[tex] And \ \ that \ \ derivative\ \ is \ \ not \ \ equal \ \ to \ \ zero. [/tex]



so ...

...
 
  • #7
I meant that the derivative of the constant -2 (which appears in the numerator) is 0, so we just have to use the product rule to take the derivative of x*sqrt(x-1). The result,

√(x-1) + (x/2)*((√(x-1))^(-1))

... sorry I don't have practice entering these equations on this system ... but now you can just sub in x = 2 and the limit falls right out.

√(2-1)+(2/2)*((√(2-1)^(-1))

√1 + (1)*(1/√1)= 2

what could be simpler?

I hope I put in the right number of parens.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Yes I solved it guys thanks for the help. By the way the problem stated on solving it using l'hopital's rule
 

Suggested for: Limit problem using l'hopital's rule

Replies
14
Views
932
Replies
7
Views
513
Replies
11
Views
769
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
576
Replies
8
Views
152
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top