Limitations in Experimentation?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crosshair
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on why a heavier cart does not stop after colliding with a lighter cart, despite the expectation of equal and opposite forces. It highlights that momentum transfer during the collision is not instantaneous; energy is gradually transferred while the objects are in contact. The lighter cart can end up moving faster than the heavier cart due to this gradual transfer of energy, which occurs as the objects compress and then release tension. The conversation also emphasizes the importance of frame of reference in understanding the motion of both carts post-collision. Overall, the interaction illustrates fundamental principles of momentum and energy transfer in physics.
Crosshair
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Physics news on Phys.org
The link doesn't work for me, so I only have your words to go on.

Think of a train hitting a bird. The bird hits the train as hard as the train hits the bird; the forces are equal and opposite. But, the train has more momentum (mass times velocity) than the bird, so it keeps barreling along with no noticeable change in speed.
 
I apologize for posting a broken link, but you understood my question.

Great analogy. Obviously, the train hitting a bird will not come to a full stop. In the video, a heavier moving cart collides with an immobile, lighter cart. The momentums of the carts are said to transfer, giving the lighter cart a larger velocity (compared to the original velocity of the heavier cart). But, I'm puzzled as to why the momentum does not completely transfer, i.e. why is any still retained by the heavier cart, considering the lighter cart is moving at a faster velocity than the original cart?

I now realized I may have misread Newton's Principia:

As if the body A impinged upon the body B at rest with 9 parts of motion, and losing 7, proceeded after reflexion with 2, the body B was carried backwards with those 7 parts.

It appears a body can proceed after contact - but, what's important is the fact that the forces are equal and opposite.

I found always, without an error of 3 inches, that when the bodies concurred together directly, equal changes towards the contrary parts were produced in their motions, and, of consequence, that the action and reaction were always equal.

Here's that link again:

http://physics.wfu.edu/demolabs/demos/avimov/mechanics/elastic_collisions/elastic_cars_bs.MPG
 
Ah, I see. The key thing here is that energy is not transferred instantly. Energy is continually transferred while the objects are in contact. At some point during the energy transfer, enough energy is transferred for the lighter mass to move faster than the heavier mass. At this point, the objects lose contact and energy transfer stops.

It's interesting to note that the lighter mass doesn't accelerate instantly, and the heavier mass doesn't slow down instantly. They compress like springs on a very small scale, and the change in speed propagates through both of the objects at the speed of sound* through the material. This is just Nature's way of avoiding sudden change.

*I think acceleration propagates at the speed of sound, anyway. If not, then the propagation is at least proportional to the speed of sound.
 
The thing is, you can always change your frame of reference.
In the video, it is in relation to a frame where the initial velocity of the second mass is zero, After collision both masses have a forward velocity, albeit the larger mass being slower than before and the smaller mass a larger velocity.

Try it in the frame of reference with the larger mass having zero velocity - ie you are moving forward with the same velocity as the larger mass and see if you can work that out. Difficult to do? Not at all - place the larger mass stationary with respect to you and the table, and have the smaller mass approach with a velocity.

Next, try it from the refererence of the combined centre of mass of both objects - ie each of the masses, the larger and the smaller, each has its own COM, but taken together as a unit, there is a system COM that does not change location, before, during, and after collision. ( Here both masses move towards each other, collide, and move apart )
 
Beside the nice explanations given... You should try the experiment with Gelatin blocks or similar soft materials.
You can observe a compression upon first contact, then tension builds up like in a spring until the lighter cart has been accelerated to the speed of the heavier, and finally the tension is released (has no more inertial opposition) and the lighter object is propelled forward.
This should be the case for most solids, although for most it will be too fast to observe.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'A scenario of non-uniform circular motion'
(All the needed diagrams are posted below) My friend came up with the following scenario. Imagine a fixed point and a perfectly rigid rod of a certain length extending radially outwards from this fixed point(it is attached to the fixed point). To the free end of the fixed rod, an object is present and it is capable of changing it's speed(by thruster say or any convenient method. And ignore any resistance). It starts with a certain speed but say it's speed continuously increases as it goes...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top