Proving \lim_{x \to a} f(x)g(x) = 0

  • Thread starter Hobold
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Function
In summary, the problem is to prove that the limit of the product of two functions, f and g, is 0 when f goes to 0 and g is a bounded function. The given attempt at a solution involved using the definition of limits, but this did not work because it was assumed that g has a limit at x = a, which is not necessarily true. Therefore, another approach is needed.
  • #1
Hobold
83
1

Homework Statement



Make [itex]f, g : X \subseteq \mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}[/itex] function with [itex]g[/itex] being a limited function and [itex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x) = 0[/itex] for [itex]a \in X[/itex]. Prove that [itex]\lim_{x \to a} f(x)g(x) = 0[/itex].

Homework Equations



A function [itex]g[/itex] is limited if there's a [itex]M>0[/itex] for which [itex]|g(x)| >= M[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



It seems pretty obvious that the affirmation is true, but I can1t find a proof for that. You can't also assume that g has a limit at x -> a because there's nothing saying that, therefore it's not possible to use a direct proof by limits properties.

I've been trying to do this by definition of limits, but I always get that limit of g when x tends to a has to exist, which is not true.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
do you mean that [itex]|g(x)| \leq M[/itex]?

knowing M couldn't you choose x close enough to a, such that f(x) is much smaller than M?
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Hobold said:
A function [itex]g[/itex] is limited if there's a [itex]M>0[/itex] for which [itex]|g(x)| >= M[/itex]
The usual terminology for such a function, with lanedance's correction, is bounded, not limited.
 

1. What is the definition of a limit?

The limit of a function at a particular point is the value that the function approaches as the input approaches that point. In other words, it is the value that the function "gets closer and closer" to as the input gets closer and closer to the given point.

2. How do you prove that the limit of a product is equal to 0?

In order to prove that the limit of a product is equal to 0, we must show that the product of the limits of the individual functions is equal to 0. This can be done by using the definition of a limit and algebraic manipulation.

3. Can the limit of a product be equal to something other than 0?

Yes, the limit of a product can be equal to something other than 0. It can be any real number or even infinity, depending on the individual functions and their limits.

4. What are the conditions for proving a limit of a product is equal to 0?

In order to prove that the limit of a product is equal to 0, both individual functions must have a limit of 0 at the given point, and one of the functions must be bounded.

5. Can the order of the functions in the product affect the limit?

Yes, the order of the functions in the product can affect the limit. In some cases, switching the order of the functions may result in a different limit or no limit at all.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
827
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
784
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
521
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
813
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
460
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
577
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
515
Back
Top