Limiting Deviation: Norms, Symbols & Names

  • Thread starter Thread starter 0xDEADBEEF
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    deviation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion highlights concerns over the lack of international norms for specifying maximum errors in measurement instruments, particularly in contrast to standard deviation methods. The preference for maximum error specifications is rooted in their practicality and ease of use, especially when dealing with non-Gaussian error distributions. The author notes a gap in available symbols and standards, specifically mentioning the German symbol "G" for maximum error. Questions raised include the existence of international norms for declaring maximum errors and the appropriate terminology used in the field. The conversation suggests that advanced statistical methods like Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA) may be beneficial for assessing complex instruments.

How should instrumentsl errors be specified?

  • Maximum error

    Votes: 2 100.0%
  • Standard deviations

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Some combination of the above

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    2
0xDEADBEEF
Messages
815
Reaction score
1
Long time no post...

I am very much disturbed after my research of measurement errors and corresponding norms, because I find so few results. There are mainly two ways to specify errors of measurement instruments. Standard deviation with its siblings and maximum error.

I am a great fan of the old German tradition to specify maximum errors only for measurement instruments. Specifying that some piece of equipment will have an error below x for all practical purposes when operated under the specified conditions is much easier to do quantitatively than statistical deviations and errors that depend on the measurement value and environmental fluctuations. Because in most cases the errors are far from being Gaussian. So you just add add all relevant maximum errors and don't care about independence.

But I couldn't find any norms about it. The relevant German ones don't have corresponding ISO norms. I couldn't even find a symbol for it. The German symbol is G for "Grenze" or "Fehlergrenze". I only get "uncertainties" and a number of k sigmas.

So after so much complaining my questions:
- Is there an international norm regarding the declaration of maximum errors.
- What symbol do you use for "maximum error" or "limiting deviation"
- If you have a better name for this and what do you call it? What is it called in your Physics books?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Generally speaking I would say "it depends." I've usually seen the "maximum accuracy error" specification as you've mentioned, usually defined in a +/- percentage value (example here: Honeywell Model 31 Force Transducer).

When qualifying the performance of a complex instrument or process, it might be prudent to use more advanced statistical methods e.g. Measurement Systems Analysis (MSA): https://www.moresteam.com/toolbox/measurement-system-analysis.cfm

Gold standard MSA books: https://www.aiag.org/source/Orders/index.cfm?search=MSA-4
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top