Limits to Superconductor Energy Storage?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the limitations of superconductors for energy storage, specifically in the context of Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) systems. Key limitations include the critical current, which defines the maximum current a superconductor can handle before losing its superconducting properties, and the geometric constraints of superconducting coils. While SMES systems are efficient and used commercially for power conditioning, their high costs and complexity make them impractical for home use. Alternatives like conventional batteries are more suitable for residential applications.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Faraday's laws of electromagnetic induction
  • Knowledge of superconductivity and critical current concepts
  • Familiarity with Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) systems
  • Basic principles of magnetic fields and coil geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of superconductivity and its applications in energy storage
  • Explore the design and functionality of Superconducting Magnetic Energy Storage (SMES) systems
  • Investigate alternatives to liquid helium cooling methods for superconductors
  • Learn about the advantages and limitations of conventional batteries versus SMES systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, energy storage researchers, and anyone interested in the practical applications and limitations of superconductors in energy systems.

John Morrell
Messages
67
Reaction score
17
I'm just starting to learn about the physics behind Faraday's laws and magnetic flux and it's gotten me thinking a lot about superconductors. I know that you can store energy in a superconductor in the form of magnetic fields since a current in a superconducting loop will persist indefinitely. What are the drawbacks to this? I assume there must be some fairly low ceiling for how much energy we can store in them, or else their utility would more than make up for the inconvenience of keeping them cool...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a critical current at which a material will cease to behave as a superconductor.
See http://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/engineering-and-technology/engineering/superconductivity/content-section-2.5
 
Superconductors ARE used for energy storage; so-called SMES systems have been used commercially for a few years. The systems are very efficient but costly and are therefore mainly used for power conditioning; i.e. to avoid "brown outs"

The amount of energy you can store is limited by the critical current and the size of the superconducting coil; the former is a property of the material used and the latter is basically limited by geometry, there is a practical upper limited to the size because you need quite a lot of structural support in order to balance the forces created because of the magnetic field within the coil and at the same time you need to avoid exceeding the critical field of the material .
 
The strong magnetic fields generated by the currents would probably be impractical for home use.
 
I thought that at first as well but after researching a bit I saw that by making the loops toroids, the external magnetic fields can be pretty small.
 
John Morrell said:
I thought that at first as well but after researching a bit I saw that by making the loops toroids, the external magnetic fields can be pretty small.
but the arrangements for cooling extreme electromagents with liquid helium will not be small.
 
rootone said:
but the arrangements for cooling extreme electromagents with liquid helium will not be small.
Most modern systems do not use liquid helium; they use pulse-tubes or some other type of coolers which only require electricity (although they are quite noisy). Liquid helium is used less and less even in research labs because of the cost.

That said, all systems of this type are too expensive and too complicated for home use. The main advantage of these systems is how rapidly they can response and you do not need that for a normal home; normal batteries would make more sense for a house.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K