Finding Inclination of Line: x = [a number]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Line
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the inclination or slope of a line represented by the equation y = mx + n, where m is the slope. The user attempts to solve for m using the equation 2m + 1 = 2m + 4 but finds it unsolvable, leading to the conclusion that the line is of the form x = [a number]. The context involves a triangle ABC with specific lines dividing angles B and C, and the user describes their method for finding the slopes and coordinates of points related to the triangle. Ultimately, they deduce that line AB is perpendicular to the X-axis, confirming that AB is represented by x = 5. The discussion highlights the process of solving geometric problems involving slopes and lines.
Chen
Messages
976
Reaction score
1
(I don't study math in English so I'm not sure what the exact terms are... please bear with me. :))

If you have this line:
y = mx + n
m is the inclination of the line, right? And I have this equation to find m:
2m + 1 = 2m + 4 (I'm finding a line between two other lines that divides the angle in half)
Obviously no m can solve that equation - this means that the line is reall of the form:
x = [a number]

Am I correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Knowing only what you've written here, my best guess is that you're correct. What was the entire problem?


P.S. we would call m the slope of the line.
 
The whole problem was this:

You have a triangle ABC, with BC on the line:
3x - 4y + 37 = 0 (BC)
And then you also have the equations for the two lines that divide the angles B and C of the triangle:
2x - y + 3 = 0 (BE)
x + 7y - 4 = 0 (CF)

I solved it by finding the slope of both AB and AC, and then finding B and C, and then finding the equations of AB and AC, and finally finding the coordinates of A.

To find m (slope of AB) I did this: (based on the given that the angle between AB and BE is the same as the angle between BE and BC)
(2 - m) / (1 + 2m) = (3/4 - 2) / (1 + 6/4) = -1/2
-4 + 2m = 1 + 2m
-4 = 1

And from this I deduced that the line AB is perpendicular (sp?) to the X axis. I found B to be (5, 13) and since it is on the AB line I figured that AB was x = 5.

Thanks for the help. :-)
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top