Line Integral Problem: Evaluating F(x,y) on Lower Half of Unit Circle

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The line integral of the vector field F = x²i + 2xyj over the lower half of the unit circle cannot be evaluated using the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals because F is not an exact differential. Specifically, the mixed partial derivatives (∂(x²)/∂y and ∂(2xy)/∂x) are not equal, confirming that no potential function f(x,y) exists such that F = ∇f. The correct approach involves parameterizing the curve using r(t) = for -π ≤ t ≤ 0 and directly integrating the expression derived from substituting dx and dy into the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and line integrals
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals
  • Knowledge of parameterization of curves in calculus
  • Ability to compute derivatives and integrals of functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of exact differentials in vector calculus
  • Learn how to parameterize curves for line integrals
  • Practice integrating vector fields over various paths
  • Explore the implications of conservative fields and potential functions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying vector calculus, mathematicians working with line integrals, and educators teaching the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals.

Mr Noblet
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let F=x^{2}i+2xyj, and let C be the lower half of the unit circle, with perametrization r(t)=<cos(t),sin(t)>,\pi\leqt\leq\pi. Evaluate \ointF\cdotdr.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I tried to do was to find a function f(x,y) so that F=\nablaf

In order to do this I integrated the i portion of F with respect to x which gave me f(x,y)=\frac{1}{3}x^{3}+g(y).

Then to find out what g was I took the derivative with respect to y which just left me with g'(y). I could not think of how to get past this part. I tried doing it with the j first as well in which I first take the integral of the j part of F with respect to y and then the derivative with respect to x. This left me with f_{x}(x,y)=y^{2}+f'(x).

Basically I was trying to use the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals but I could not find a function f(x,y) so that F=\nablaf. Help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not necessarily the case that F is the gradient of anything. If if happens to be, then the line integral is independent of the path, which makes it particularly easy; but if not, then you just have to do the integral.
 
Mr Noblet said:

Homework Statement



Let F=x^{2}i+2xyj, and let C be the lower half of the unit circle, with perametrization r(t)=<cos(t),sin(t)>,\pi\leqt\leq\pi.
Do you mean -\pi\le x\le 0? Or \pi\le x\le 2\pi which would work just as well.

Evaluate \ointF\cdotdr.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



The first thing I tried to do was to find a function f(x,y) so that F=\nablaf

In order to do this I integrated the i portion of F with respect to x which gave me f(x,y)=\frac{1}{3}x^{3}+g(y).

Then to find out what g was I took the derivative with respect to y which just left me with g'(y). I could not think of how to get past this part. I tried doing it with the j first as well in which I first take the integral of the j part of F with respect to y and then the derivative with respect to x. This left me with f_{x}(x,y)=y^{2}+f'(x).

Basically I was trying to use the Fundamental Theorem of Line Integrals but I could not find a function f(x,y) so that F=\nablaf. Help would be appreciated.[/QUOTE]
You can't find such an f because x^2 dx+ 2xy dy is not an exact differential: (x^2)_y= 0 while (2xy)_x= 2y. Since those are not the same, there is no F such that grad F= x^2\vec{i}+ 2xy\vec{j}

With x= cos(t) and y= sin(t), dx= -sin(t)dt and dy= cos(t)dt x^2 dx+ 2xy dy= cos^2(t)(-sint dt)+ 2cos(t)sin(t)(cos(t) dt)= cos^2(t) sin(t) dt. It should be easy to integrate that directly.
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K