Line Integrals: Evaluating with Respect to Arc Length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around evaluating the line integral of x*e^y with respect to arc length along the unit circle from (1,0) to (-1,0). The user correctly parameterizes the circle using x = cos(theta) and y = sin(theta), leading to the integral of cos(theta) * e^sin(theta) dtheta from 0 to pi. The confusion arises when the integral evaluates to zero, which is confirmed as correct due to the function being odd with respect to the y-axis and the symmetric limits of integration. An alternative approach from (0,-1) to (0,1) demonstrates a non-zero result, highlighting the importance of symmetry in line integrals. The conclusion emphasizes that the original evaluation is indeed accurate.
wubie
Hello,

I must be having some sort of brain malfunction or something. First here is my question:

Evaluate the line integral with respect to arc length

The integral sub C of x*e^y ds where C is the arc of the unit circle from (1,0) to (-1,0) traversed counterclockwise.

Now if the circle is traversed counterclockwise then

-1 <= x <= 1 and 0 <= y <= 1.

I can parameterize the equation by noticing that

x = cos theta and y = sin theta.

Therefore the integral becomes

The integral of cos theta * e^sin theta ds

where ds is

( (-sin theta)^2 + (cos theta)^2 )^1/2 = 1

So the integral becomes

The integral of cos theta * e^sin theta dtheta.

Since the unit circle is traversed counterclockwise the angle goes from 0 to pi.

If I let sin theta = u then du = cos theta and the limits become zero and zero.

So if I integrate the integral of e^u du then I get

e^u with the limits of 0 and 0 which ends up to be zero.

This cannot be right can it? I am confused. I think I did everything correctly. Where am I going wrong?

Perhaps I am right?

Any help is appreciated. Thankyou.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right to me, but then I've always sucked at path integrals, so. Maybe Matt will grace you with his presence.

It actually kinda seems right, too. It's an odd function with respect to the y-axis, and since we're going from -1 to 1, we have a symmetric domain. That suggests an answer of 0.

cookiemonster
 
Yes, that's exactly right. "xey" is an odd function with respect to x and since the path of integration is symmetric with respect to the y-axis the integral is 0.

If it makes you feel better, you might try looking at exactly the same problem from (0,-1) to (0,1) instead. You get exactly the same integral except that theta now runs from -pi/2 to pi/2. Since you are making the substitution u= sin(theta), you integration will be from
-1 to 1 giving a non-zero result. That is, of course, correct since the function is not symmetric with respect to the x-axis.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top