Line Level Frequency Splitting

AI Thread Summary
The project involves filtering audio output from devices like iPods into low, mid, and high frequencies to drive color-coded LEDs. Passive filters will separate these frequencies, and the resulting signals will be rectified to generate DC voltage levels for pulse-width modulation. The typical input signal peak voltage from consumer devices is around 0.45 volts, raising the question of whether amplification should occur before or after filtering. The NTE890 is being considered for translating DC voltage into PWM, but there is also a suggestion to use 555 timer ICs for this purpose. Ultimately, the goal is to create a visualizer that uses red, green, and blue LEDs to represent different frequency ranges, functioning as both a spectrum analyzer and effects lighting.
Kurinn
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I'm working on a project that involves taking the audio output from a consumer device like an iPod or whatever, filtering for low, mid, and high frequencies, and then converting the levels into a PWM to drive LEDs for each frequency range.

Passive filters will separate the low (<500 Hz), mid (500>1000 Hz), and high (>1000 Hz) frequencies, at which point I will rectify the separate signals to get a DC voltage level, which will be used to derive pulse-width modulation to drive LEDs color coded to each range.

If Wikipedia is to be trusted, typical peak voltage for the input signal from most consumer devices will be 0.45 volts or so. Should I be trying to amplify before my passive filters, or after?

I noticed that radio shack carries the NTE890. I think it might serve to translate the DC voltage into the PWM I want to drive my LEDs. Does anyone have any experience with the NTE890 in regards to this application?

Would I be better off just using 555 timer ICs to accomplish this?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Are you trying to make a simple, three band spectrum analyser here? Is it to drive effects lighting. Or what?
It's not clear, from your suggested integrated circuit, what exactly you want to do. Let's establish that first.
 
sophiecentaur said:
Are you trying to make a simple, three band spectrum analyser here? Is it to drive effects lighting. Or what?
It's not clear, from your suggested integrated circuit, what exactly you want to do. Let's establish that first.

Sorry. To be clear, let's step back a bit. I want to create a visualizer which uses red for base, green for mid-range, and blue for high frequencies. It effectively drives effects lighting, but it is in some crude sense a spectrum analyzer. Filters cut off low, mid-range, and high frequencies. These signals are then rectified to DC voltage levels. The voltage levels then dictate pulse width signals which drive LEDs for red, green, and blue respective to the associated bandwidths.
 
Very basic question. Consider a 3-terminal device with terminals say A,B,C. Kirchhoff Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff Voltage Law (KVL) establish two relationships between the 3 currents entering the terminals and the 3 terminal's voltage pairs respectively. So we have 2 equations in 6 unknowns. To proceed further we need two more (independent) equations in order to solve the circuit the 3-terminal device is connected to (basically one treats such a device as an unbalanced two-port...
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Back
Top