How Many Spectral Lines are Produced During Electron Transitions in Hydrogen?

vkash
Messages
316
Reaction score
1
no of line in line spectrum is equal to jumps of electron from one shell to another. Am i correct.

IN my book it is written that if a electron in hydrogen jumps from n1 to n2 then number of spectral lines is given by formula {(n1-n2)(n1-n2+1}/2. so consider a electron jump from 4th shell to 2nd shell then number of kinds of jump can be (1) 4th to 3rd,(2) 4th to 2nd So there are only two jumps. but if we apply formula then it will come out to be 3. So where i or formula is wrong.
thanks for any kind of help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
vkash said:
no of line in line spectrum is equal to jumps of electron from one shell to another. Am i correct.

IN my book it is written that if a electron in hydrogen jumps from n1 to n2 then number of spectral lines is given by formula {(n1-n2)(n1-n2+1}/2. so consider a electron jump from 4th shell to 2nd shell then number of kinds of jump can be (1) 4th to 3rd,(2) 4th to 2nd So there are only two jumps. but if we apply formula then it will come out to be 3. So where i or formula is wrong.
thanks for any kind of help.

what about 3rd to 2nd?
 
SpectraCat said:
what about 3rd to 2nd?

dear 4th 3rd and 2nd represent the energy level of hydrogen atom n1 and n2 represent the given energy level. Do you got it.
 
vkash said:
dear 4th 3rd and 2nd represent the energy level of hydrogen atom n1 and n2 represent the given energy level. Do you got it.

Yes, "I got it". You asked what the "third" transition was that is possible in the manifold of levels including 4,3, and 2. I told you the answer. The formula is correct, you just missed a transition with your initial analysis.
 
SpectraCat said:
Yes, "I got it". You asked what the "third" transition was that is possible in the manifold of levels including 4,3, and 2. I told you the answer. The formula is correct, you just missed a transition with your initial analysis.
what's that transition is that 3rd to 2nd. other transitions are already mentioned above.
 
vkash said:
what's that transition is that 3rd to 2nd. other transitions are already mentioned above.

Do you understand what you already wrote? I mean from the 3rd shell to the 2nd shell. Just like you "already mentioned" 4th shell to 3rd shell, and 4th shell to 2nd shell.

Draw yourself a picture, using stacked horizontal lines to represent the states (2, 3 and 4), and downward arrows to represent the transitions. You should see that there are 3 possibilities almost immediately.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top