Linear Algebra Book Recommendations

  • Thread starter Thread starter hotcommodity
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Text
hotcommodity
Messages
434
Reaction score
0
I'm wondering if anyone here can recommend a good book on things like transformations, operators, bases, and vectorspaces. I had trouble with this subject matter when I took linear algebra, not just understaing the material but picturing it as well. Any recommendations appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nicalous Bourbaki
 
And the title of the book I should be looking for is?..
 
I'm not quite sure what level you're looking for, but I think Axler's Linear Algebra Done Right is pretty good. It's designed for an advanced undergraduate linear algebra course. It's pretty good at giving you a better understanding of the subject, but if you're looking more towards applying it (outside of mathematics), it may not be the right book for you.
 
I'm not looking to apply it so much, just to get a good understanding of it. Other students in my linear class seemed to grasp the concepts quite easily, I think it may be due to the fact that they had taken discrete mathematics, tho' I'm not too sure. I hate to ignore the material and to have a crude understanding of it. I appreciate the recommendation, I'll check it out.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...

Similar threads

Back
Top