Linear Algebra (confusing sentence in Griffiths)

mccoy1
Messages
116
Reaction score
0
In Griffiths Intro to QM (2nd edn) p437 -on linear independent vectors..
" A collection of vectors is said to span the space if every vector can be written as a linear combination of the members of this set".
Well, does this means all member vectors are linearly dependent because that's what I'm thinking? If so, does this means that all linearly independent vectors don't span the space?
Thanks for the clarification.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
that sentence is equivalent to: a set of vectors spans a space if they form a basis for that space. A better phrasing would be " A [set] of vectors is said to span the space if every vector [in the space] can be written as a linear combination of the members of this set"
 
sgd37 said:
that sentence is equivalent to: a set of vectors spans a space if they form a basis for that space. A better phrasing would be " A [set] of vectors is said to span the space if every vector [in the space] can be written as a linear combination of the members of this set"

Yes your explanation makes lot of sense...thank you for your help.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top