Linear Algebra Help: Reduce Matrix & Find Error

JohnPrior3
Messages
17
Reaction score
5
So I had a quiz on Wednesday and got the problem wrong but don't know why. The question is:

Use elementary row operations to reduce the matrix

A= 3 1 -1
2 3 1
-4 0 2

to upper-triangular form. Each of these elementary row operations should have the form Ri :=Ri-likRk where lil is an appropriate multiplier. Show the values of each of the ilk's and the order in which each of the elementary row operations is applied. (For this exercise, do not interchange any rows.)

Hint: When you are done, the product of the three pivots should be -2.

I had l21= 2/3 and did R2:= R3=2/3R1 and and then did l31=-4/3 R3:=-R3-(-4/3)R1

My matrix at the end was
3 1 -1
0 7/3 5/3
0 0 2/3

Which is upper triangular form, but incorrect. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Shouldn't the determinants be the same? They are not! In any case you didn't finish. Following what you did the third row is (0,4/3,2/3).
 
mathman said:
Shouldn't the determinants be the same? They are not! In any case you didn't finish. Following what you did the third row is (0,4/3,2/3).
Then how would I get the upper triangular system? I know I am supposed to have three pivots, but I don't know how to take three such that the product would be -2.
 
A= \begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 3 & 1 \\ -4 & 0 & 2 \end{bmatrix}

You want "0"s below the "3" in the first column so subtract 2/3 times the first row from the second row and add 4/3 times the first row from the third row. That gives
\begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 7/3 & 5/3 \\ 0 & 4/3 & 2/3 \end{bmatrix}

Now you want a "0" below the "7/3" in the second column so subtract (4/3)/(7/3)= 4/7 times the second row from the third row. 2/3- (4/7)(5/3)= 14/21- 20/21= -6/21= -2/7, not 2/3. It looks like you just forgot to do that final subtraction!
 
HallsofIvy said:
A= \begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & -1 \\ 2 & 3 & 1 \\ -4 & 0 & 2 \end{bmatrix}

You want "0"s below the "3" in the first column so subtract 2/3 times the first row from the second row and add 4/3 times the first row from the third row. That gives
\begin{bmatrix}3 & 1 & -1 \\ 0 & 7/3 & 5/3 \\ 0 & 4/3 & 2/3 \end{bmatrix}

Now you want a "0" below the "7/3" in the second column so subtract (4/3)/(7/3)= 4/7 times the second row from the third row. 2/3- (4/7)(5/3)= 14/21- 20/21= -6/21= -2/7, not 2/3. It looks like you just forgot to do that final subtraction!
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1410709456.427315.jpg

Thanks! I am really happy you say that. I had gotten to that conclusion yesterday and I thought it was wrong. So how does my revision look?
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top