Linear Algebra: Solve B^(-1) with A, C, D

sam0617
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
I'm looking for help to this problem. Here is my attempt:

I being the identity matrix and B^(-1) being B to the negative 1st power.

A (B B^(-1)) C D = B^(-1) I
so A I C D = B^(-1)
so A C D = B^(-1)

Thank you for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


sam0617 said:
I'm looking for help to this problem. Here is my attempt:

I being the identity matrix and B^(-1) being B to the negative 1st power.

A (B B^(-1)) C D = B^(-1) I
so A I C D = B^(-1)
so A C D = B^(-1)

Thank you for any help.

Hey sam0617 and welcome to the forums.

Assuming you start off with ABCD = I, that operation will not work. In terms of matrix operations with multiplication, you can only left multiply or right multiply, and you have to do the same thing for each side.

So if you want to pre-multiply by B^(-1), then you will get B^(-1) x ABCD = B^(-1) x I = B^(-1) which is not equal to ACD.

Given these hints, what is your next step?
 


chiro said:
Hey sam0617 and welcome to the forums.

Assuming you start off with ABCD = I, that operation will not work. In terms of matrix operations with multiplication, you can only left multiply or right multiply, and you have to do the same thing for each side.

So if you want to pre-multiply by B^(-1), then you will get B^(-1) x ABCD = B^(-1) x I = B^(-1) which is not equal to ACD.

Given these hints, what is your next step?

I think I figured it out. I can't just do what I did on my attempt. (I wrote that on my test but owell)

A^(-1)ABCD = A^(-1)I
BCD = A^(-1)
BCDA=A^(-1) A
BCDA = I
B^(-1)BCDA = B^(-1)I
CDA = B^(-1)

Thank you for the help.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top