Linear Algebra: Subspace Proof

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the intersection of any collection of subspaces of a vector space V is itself a subspace of V. Participants are exploring the necessary conditions to establish this proof within the context of linear algebra.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to outline the requirements for proving the intersection is a subspace, specifically focusing on closure under addition and scalar multiplication. Some participants question the application of these properties in the general case versus the trivial case.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the proof requirements, with some hints being offered to guide the original poster's reasoning. There appears to be a productive exchange regarding the definitions and properties of subspaces, though no consensus on a complete solution has been reached.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes considerations of specific cases, such as the trivial intersection, and the need for clarity on definitions related to subspaces and intersections.

*melinda*
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
Prove that the intersection of any collection of subspaces of V is a subspace of V.

Ok, I know I need to show that:

1. For all u and v in the intersection, it must imply that u+v is in the intersection, and

2. For all u in the intersection and c in some field, cu must be in the intersection.

I can show both 1. and 2. for the trivial case where the intersection is zero, but I'm not sure what I need to do for the arbitrary case.

Any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, I'm not sure where you're stuck, so I'll throw out two random hints.


(a) Let W be one of the spaces in the intersection...

(b) What is the definition of "x is in the intersection"?
 
Since u and v are elements of the intersection, u and v will also be elements of any subspace W that is in the intersection. And since u and v are in W and W is a subspace, this guarantees that u+v will also be in W. This same argument would apply to scalar multiplication.

Is that the right idea?
 
Yes, that is one of the essential points of the proof.
 
Thanks!
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K