# Linear Charge Distribution on a Needle?

• TheDemx27
In summary: There must be something wrong with this ellipsoid model, since we know that the charge is supposed to collect at the ends of an object. (right?) I mean, that's how static wicks on planes operate. Not only that, but every other model used in the paper produces a charge distribution you would expect: Higher charge density near the ends of the object.There might be something wrong with the model, but I'm not sure what it is.
TheDemx27
Gold Member

I was reading this paper, and was confused by a result in section 2-A. (Heck they even mention they weren't expecting it themselves). The purpose of the paper is to find the linear charge density for a wire and they use several models, the first of which treats the wire like an ellipsoid. They end up with an expression that doesn't depend on ##x##, ##y##, or ##z##, but only on ##Q## and ##a##:

##\lambda(x)=\frac{Q}{2a}##​

Meaning that the charge density is constant as you move along the x-axis.
Its pretty crazy how nicely things simplify in the paper.

Certainly there must be something wrong with this ellipsoid model, since we know that the charge is supposed to collect at the ends of an object. (right?) I mean, that's how static wicks on planes operate. Not only that, but every other model used in the paper produces a charge distribution you would expect: Higher charge density near the ends of the object.

I'm pretty sure that using ellipsoids like they did isn't a good way to model this judging by the discrepancy in the results. This is also coupled with the fact that it is counter intuitive for me.

Is this model really correct?
Are ellipsoids really mathematically special objects that have linear charge distributions?

Thanks in advance to anyone who can clear things up.

I can imagine that different shapes lead to different answers. A cylinder clearly leads to a non-uniform distribution at least at the ends, but the ellipsoid has a different tilt for its surface (=electric fields on the surface are a bit tilted outwards), so more charge closer to the center (compared to the cylinder) sounds reasonable. Interesting to see a constant result.

Hmm, checking the ellipsoid probably requires reference 2.

Edit: A constant charge density plus two extra charges at the end does not give a uniform potential in between. The line has to be more complicated.

Computing power increased by orders of magnitude in the last 20 years, it should be possible to run much better simulations.

Last edited:
Ellipsoids are indeed special. Polarization in a cylinder in a uniform E field has no analytic solution, likewise magnetization of a ferrous rod in uniform B. Demagnetizing fields and all sorts of approximations were invented (in days before computers) to handle it. A ferrous ellipsoid in uniform B has an exact and simple solution, however--B and M inside are perfectly uniform! It's not so surprising that rho is uniform as well.

TheDemx27
marcusl said:
Ellipsoids are indeed special... A ferrous ellipsoid in uniform B has an exact and simple solution, however--B and M inside are perfectly uniform! It's not so surprising that rho is uniform as well.

mfb said:
A cylinder clearly leads to a non-uniform distribution at least at the ends, but the ellipsoid has a different tilt for its surface (=electric fields on the surface are a bit tilted outwards), so more charge closer to the center (compared to the cylinder) sounds reasonable.

Thats good to know!

But back to the paper, is the ellipsoid model really applicable in this context? i.e. does it really make sense to treat the ellipsoid as a one dimensional line charge like they do by taking the ##\lim_{b, c \to 0}(\frac{Q}{2a})##? Sure it makes sense from a purely mathematical point of view, but the results are completely different, and its not even really a 3 dimensional figure anymore.

## 1. What is a linear charge distribution on a needle?

A linear charge distribution on a needle refers to the distribution of electric charge along the length of a thin, pointed needle. This distribution can be positive, negative, or neutral and is typically represented by the symbol λ.

## 2. How is the linear charge density calculated on a needle?

The linear charge density is calculated by dividing the total charge on the needle by its length. Mathematically, it is represented as λ = Q/L, where Q is the charge and L is the length of the needle.

## 3. What is the significance of a linear charge distribution on a needle?

A linear charge distribution on a needle creates an electric field around the needle, which can attract or repel other charged objects. This phenomenon is used in many applications, such as electrostatic precipitators and electrostatic generators.

## 4. How does the linear charge distribution on a needle affect its behavior in an electric field?

The linear charge distribution on a needle determines the strength and direction of the electric field around it. A higher linear charge density will result in a stronger electric field, while a negative linear charge density will cause the electric field to point in the opposite direction.

## 5. How can the linear charge distribution on a needle be changed?

The linear charge distribution on a needle can be changed by adding or removing charge from the needle, or by changing its length. It can also be altered by surrounding the needle with other charged objects, which can influence the distribution of charge on the needle.

• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
826
• Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
1
Views
3K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
16
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
5K
• Electromagnetism
Replies
4
Views
3K