Linear Equations & Quantum Mechanics

StevieTNZ
Messages
1,934
Reaction score
873
Say we can find a solution to the Schrodinger equation, which gives a superposition of two states x1 and x2. Say this occurs at time0.

The equation evolves over time, say to time1.

At time1, are x1 and x2 (the same states found by solving the Schrodinger equation at time0) still superposition states in a solution to the Schrodinger equation at time1?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
StevieTNZ said:
Say we can find a solution to the Schrodinger equation, which gives a superposition of two states x1 and x2. Say this occurs at time0.

The equation evolves over time, say to time1.

At time1, are x1 and x2 (the same states found by solving the Schrodinger equation at time0) still superposition states in a solution to the Schrodinger equation at time1?

Yes, since as soon as the superposition is reconciled as a definite result, the wavefunction no longer applies.
 
If we can write our initial state as

|\psi(t=0)>=A|1>+B|2>

where |1> & |2> are our orthogonal states.

If we want the solution at a later time, we then apply the time evolution operator to the system:

|\psi(t)>=e^{iHt/\hbar}|\psi(0)>

So, if |1> and |2> are both eigenfunctions of H, the Hamiltonian, the solution at time t will remain a superposition of |1> and |2>, but can be a different superposition:

i.e.

|\psi(t)>=A'|1>+B'|2>=Ae^{iE_1t/\hbar}|1>+Be^{iE_2t/\hbar}|2>

Notice however:

If |1> and |2> are not energy eigenstates, then we need to expand them in terms of energy eigenstates before we apply the time evolution operator. The resulting state at time t will still be able to be written as a superposition of energy eigenstates, but not necessarily as a superposition of |1> and |2>.
_PJ_ said:
Yes, since as soon as the superposition is reconciled as a definite result, the wavefunction no longer applies.

I am not sure what you are saying.
 
Last edited:
G01 said:
If we can write our initial state as

|\psi(t=0)>=A|1>+B|2>

where |1> & |2> are our orthogonal states.

If we want the solution at a later time, we then apply the time evolution operator to the system:

|\psi(t)>=e^{iHt/\hbar}|\psi(0)>

So, if |1> and |2> are both eigenfunctions of H, the Hamiltonian, the solution at time t will remain a superposition of |1> and |2>, but can be a different superposition:

i.e.

|\psi(t)>=A'|1>+B'|2>=Ae^{iE_1t/\hbar}|1>+Be^{iE_2t/\hbar}|2>

Just so I follow, the states |1> and |2> are the same at t=0 and t=1, just that the solution to the equation at t=1 will look different? i.e you add e^{iHt/\hbar} to the front of each state in the solution at t=1.
 
StevieTNZ said:
Just so I follow, the states |1> and |2> are the same at t=0 and t=1, just that the solution to the equation at t=1 will look different? i.e you add e^{iHt/\hbar} to the front of each state in the solution at t=1.

Yes,

If the state |a> is an energy eigenstate, at t=t1, The state |a> will be the same (up to the phase factor e^{iE_at/\hbar} )

However, if the state |a> is not an energy eigenstate, then the time evolution operator e^{iHt/\hbar} does not give just a phase factor like above.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...

Similar threads

Back
Top