Linear Expansion related to area expansion

AI Thread Summary
To determine the minimum tolerance needed to prevent a windshield from breaking due to temperature changes, the area expansion coefficient is calculated as twice the linear expansion coefficient of glass, which is 9 x 10^-6 (C)-1. The area of the windshield is 900,000 mm², and the temperature change is 111 degrees Celsius. The confusion arises from whether to use the dimensions in cm or mm for calculations, with a suggestion to focus on the larger dimension for accuracy. The discussion emphasizes that only linear expansion should be considered for this problem. Ultimately, the correct approach involves careful unit conversion and application of the area expansion formula.
student 1
Messages
76
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An automobile windshild has dimensions of 60 cm by 150 cm. What minimum tolerance in mm is needed to prevent the windshield from breaking if the temperature changes by 200 degrees Farenheight? (The linear expansion coeffecient of galss is 9 x 10^{}-6
(C)-1

Homework Equations


area expansion = Ai(Area expansion coefficient)(Change in Temp)
Area expansion coefficient=2(Linear expansion coefficient)

The Attempt at a Solution


I found my area to be 900,000 mm2 The change in temperature 111 Degrees Celsius. but I'm not getting the right answer when I multiply 2(Linear expansion coefficient)
I'm getting a huge number for my final answer when it should be really small.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't need to consider anything beyond linear expansion. They are looking for an answer in mm.
 
So do I use the 60 mm or the 150 mm? I figured I was trying to over think it.
 
student 1 said:
So do I use the 60 mm or the 150 mm?
Good question. Each dimension would have a different answer. If I had to pick, I'd go with the larger dimension. (Note that those measurements are in cm, not mm.)
 
ok, I'll try them both! Thanks!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
6K
Back
Top