Linear FE for static, spherical body

WannabeNewton
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
5,848
Reaction score
552
How exactly would I go about finding the components of h_{ab} of the linear vacuum field equations for the external gravitational field of a static, spherical body situated at x = y = z = 0 for all t? I assumed since x = y = z = 0 for all t all h_{ab},x and ,y and ,z terms vanish from the Riemann tensor. Do I go about solving R_{ab} = 0 for h_{ab} because I can't really see where the spherical part comes in.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WannabeNewton said:
How exactly would I go about finding the components of h_{ab} of the linear vacuum field equations for the external gravitational field of a static, spherical body situated at x = y = z = 0 for all t? I assumed since x = y = z = 0 for all t all h_{ab},x and ,y and ,z terms vanish from the Riemann tensor. Do I go about solving R_{ab} = 0 for h_{ab} because I can't really see where the spherical part comes in.

Use spherical polar coordinates and let hab=hab(r) be a function of r only. Then you'll have spherical symmetry.
 
I just don't get what to do with the linear field equations in this case: \nabla_{\alpha }\nabla_{\alpha }h_{\mu \nu }= 0
(\alphas should be lower indexes sorry)
with g_{\mu \nu } = diag(-1, 1, r^{2}, r^{2}sin^{2}\theta)

Do I set up a generalized metric like one would for the full field equations?
 
The linear theory is a sort of local theory and assumes we can use approximately Cartesian coords, so my first post is wrong.

It's a tricky business deriving the linearized field equations. I recommend you look it up in a textbook,
or have a look at this

http://www.lehigh.edu/~kdw5/project/howto1.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The linearized field obeys the linear wave equation, or in this time-independent case Laplace's equation. With spherical symmetry it's just like the electrostatic potential for the Coulomb field of a charge, h ~ m/r. Put together solutions of this form that satisfy your gauge condition.
 
I'm actually fine on the derivation. The subsequent solution for the plane gravitational wave was pretty straight forward too. I'm just confused with what to do with the field equations and the Lorentz gauge in the case of curvilinear coordinates like in this situation.
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Abstract The gravitational-wave signal GW250114 was observed by the two LIGO detectors with a network matched-filter signal-to-noise ratio of 80. The signal was emitted by the coalescence of two black holes with near-equal masses ## m_1=33.6_{-0.8}^{+1.2} M_{⊙} ## and ## m_2=32.2_{-1. 3}^{+0.8} M_{⊙}##, and small spins ##\chi_{1,2}\leq 0.26 ## (90% credibility) and negligible eccentricity ##e⁢\leq 0.03.## Postmerger data excluding the peak region are consistent with the dominant quadrupolar...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top